That and other advice in this interview with George Saunders:
George Saunders: Right—those two are kind of like bookends—although also, wow, what a terror, to be quoted so accurately at such great temporal distance. You may remember some of my other biggies, such as, “Any monkey in a story had better be a dead monkey,” and “Aunts and uncles are best construed as the heliological equivalent of small-scale weather systems,” or (the mother of all advice-quote-pairs): “The number of rooms in a fictional house should be inversely proportional to the years during which the couple living in that house enjoyed true happiness.”
The first idea (“move towards the complicated”) is, I think, best understood as a habit of mind generally worth cultivating. Basically: steer towards the rapids. Say we’re writing “Little Red Riding Hood,” and we’ve just typed: “One day, Red’s mother handed her a picnic basket and told her to go see Granny, but not to talk to any strangers along the way.” So—should we have her meet a stranger? Yes. Should that stranger be potentially dangerous, like, say, a wolf? Sounds promising. Should Red engage with the wolf? (What a drag, if, at that point, she takes Mom’s advice and ignores the wolf: story over). Should the wolf she meets be evil, or a gentle, New Age wolf, who gives her some nice poems about daughter/granddaughter relations? Looking at a familiar story like that one, it’s pretty clear: a story is a thing that is full of dozens of crossroads moments, and if we make a habit of first, noticing these, and, second, steering toward the choice that gives off incrementally more power (or light, or heat, or throws open other interesting doors, etc.), this will, over the long haul, make the story more unique, more like itself, more incendiary. (Although even as I type this, I find myself intrigued by the poem-giving wolf. . . . )
That’s where the second idea comes in: as we try to steer toward the rapids, we sometimes do so reflexively, thus overriding reality, or probability, or story-power, in a way that can seem like a tic . . .
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading:
- Story by Story: Brian Evenson’s Fugue State (16) “Alfons Kuylers” Blake Butler is taking on Brian Evenson’s new collection Fugue State story by story. Here he’s agreed to share his take on the 16th story...
- In Persuasion Nation George Saunders’s new short story collection gets reviewed at the LA Times. Back when Philip K. Dick asked "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" who...
- Old–and new–short story collections On the recommendation of JRSM (whose Caustic Cover Critic blog is worth the time of any fan of book design), I recently picked up a...
- Is French Literature Dead? Nice to know we American's aren't the only ones who can ask trivial questions about the death of things. This time it's an unnamed French...
- Tell A Story During the LBC discussion of Valerie Trueblood’s Seven Loves, Trueblood herself showed up for a post. In part, she wrote: While I enjoy novels with...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

















Why Is Everyone Reviewing HHhH?
Naked Singularity Big Read Schedule
More on Bolano’s Journalist





The Names by Don DeLillo (1982)
The Box Man by Kobo Abe (1973, English 1974)
Head in Flames by Lance Olsen (2009)
Agaat by Marlene van Niekerk (2006, English 2010)
The Weather Fifteen Years Ago by Wolf Haas (2006, English 2009)
I just wanted to mention that I was glad to see the reference here to the Steinbeck Library. He’s someone who deserves never to go out of print, always to be in somebody’s hands.