<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bring Back the Mass Market Paperback!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conversationalreading.com/bring-back-the-mass-market-paperback/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conversationalreading.com/bring-back-the-mass-market-paperback</link>
	<description>Reviews, interviews, news, and lots of opinion on world literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 18:22:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://conversationalreading.com/bring-back-the-mass-market-paperback/comment-page-1#comment-8833</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationalreading.com/?p=7238#comment-8833</guid>
		<description>Oh, I absolutely love those old seventies paperbacks. I have a ton of them. A particular favorite that I own is William Gass&#039;s Omensetter&#039;s Luck. It was so weird to find that with the illustrated cover proclaiming it &quot;Dazzling!&quot; in bold letters.

The problem I see with bringing them back is that currently mass-market paperback is synonymous with &quot;airport read&quot; and the covers to all those books, from sci-fi to romance to thriller, are uniformly atrocious. Now, some of those old seventies paperbacks have goofy covers, like that one for DeLillo&#039;s Players, but a lot of them have pretty great design. However, no one&#039;s going to want to read the latest National Book Award winner if it looks like a James Patterson book, with all the super-large font and crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I absolutely love those old seventies paperbacks. I have a ton of them. A particular favorite that I own is William Gass&#8217;s Omensetter&#8217;s Luck. It was so weird to find that with the illustrated cover proclaiming it &#8220;Dazzling!&#8221; in bold letters.</p>
<p>The problem I see with bringing them back is that currently mass-market paperback is synonymous with &#8220;airport read&#8221; and the covers to all those books, from sci-fi to romance to thriller, are uniformly atrocious. Now, some of those old seventies paperbacks have goofy covers, like that one for DeLillo&#8217;s Players, but a lot of them have pretty great design. However, no one&#8217;s going to want to read the latest National Book Award winner if it looks like a James Patterson book, with all the super-large font and crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
