Late in Buddenbrooks (p. 633 in the Woods translation), family patriarch Thomas has an epiphany while reading a casually acquired book:
The chapter that triggers this recognition is entitled "Concerning Death and Its Relation to the Indestructibility of Our Essential Nature," and it's part of a real book (although Mann gives no clues regarding its origin). Specifically, it's a chapter of Arthur Schopenhauer's The World as Will and Representation, the major expression of his thought. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy summarizes:
Among 19th century philosophers, Arthur Schopenhauer was
among the first to contend that at its core, the universe is not a
rational place. Inspired by Plato and Kant, both of whom regarded the
world as being more amenable to reason, Schopenhauer developed their
philosophies into an instinct-recognizing and ultimately ascetic
outlook, emphasizing that in the face of a world filled with endless
strife, we ought to minimize our natural desires to achieve a more
tranquil frame of mind and a disposition towards universal
beneficence. Often considered to be a thoroughgoing pessimist,
Schopenhauer in fact advocated ways — via artistic, moral and
ascetic forms of awareness — to overcome a frustration-filled
and fundamentally painful human condition. Since his death in 1860,
his philosophy has had a special attraction for those who wonder about
life's meaning, along with those engaged in music, literature, and the
visual arts.
It's a major shock to witness this man, a model citizen and his generation's only real guardian of the Buddenbrook myth, fall under the spell of these ideas. Mann keeps a poker face here, never drawing explicit connections between Thomas Buddenbrook's mental state and his family's many misfortunes, but the placement of the Schopenhauerian epiphany at the end of a long string of indignities leaves little doubt that events in the world have driven the head of the family to question his assumptions about life.
A hundred years later, in The Corrections, a novel likened to Buddenbrooks by a number of critics, Jonathan Franzen had his patriarch Alfred Lambert turn to Schopenhauer at a similarly low emotional ebb. I assume this episode was meant to be an homage to the earlier book, but can't find confirmation – does anyone know?
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading:
- This Month, We’ll Be Reading Buddenbrooks Last spring I was completely blown away by Thomas Mann's novel Doctor Faustus. On the spot I vowed to read more Mann, and then didn't...
- Buddenbrooks: A Post-War and Peace Novel While we're reading Buddenbrooks, I think it will be useful to consider the book as a sort of work written in the tradition of War...
- Buddenbrooks: Which Translation? Katy at Love German Books asks which translation of Buddenbrooks we're reading. I don't know which Sacha and John are reading, so maybe they'll chime...
- Buddenbrooks: Why Woods? Like Scott, I’m reading the John E. Woods translation of Buddenbrooks. I confess that my decision to read this particular translation was not the product...
- What’s at Stake in Buddenbrooks? As previously discussed, Buddenbrooks' subtitle makes clear that this is a book about the decline of a great family. So, an important question: Why should...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

















Stealing from Conversational Reading
Latest Krasznahorkai Link
Naked Singularity Big Read Schedule





The Names by Don DeLillo (1982)
The Box Man by Kobo Abe (1973, English 1974)
Head in Flames by Lance Olsen (2009)
Agaat by Marlene van Niekerk (2006, English 2010)
The Weather Fifteen Years Ago by Wolf Haas (2006, English 2009)
You Say