This has to be the dumbest thing to come out of the Swedish Academy since Knut got all up in arms about giving Elfriede Jelinek the Nobel.
A number of people had emailed or called me about the controversial
statements made by Swedish Academy’s permanent secretary Horace Engdahl
about American writing, basically stating that the U.S. is too
culturally insular to have a writer worthy of the Nobel Prize.
Speaking of Jelinek, apparently a famous recluse with a recognized "social phobia" isn’t too insular to receive a Nobel.
The fact that someone like Jelinek could receive a Nobel just underscores how absurd these remarks are . . . fact is, by and large Americans are insular, but that obviously doesn’t mean that any one American can’t have read and traveled widely. Examples of Americans writing fiction reflective of this can be easily provided.
Of course, this is to ignore the whole issue that you don’t necessarily have to write fiction that proves you’re not insular to write well. But this isn’t the kind of fiction the Nobel is interested in.
This also underscores how the Nobel has more or less become an award for politically engaged writers. To be a writer the Academy likes you probably do have to think Europe is the center of literary culture and be enough of a world citizen to acutely break down some major socio-political topic in your works. Fine. Lots of good novels have been written that do this, but it betrays a significant ignorance of literary culture to assume this is the best or only kind of novel.
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading:
- Nobel Reaction The Guardian is pleased with Pamuk winnnig the Nobel: Rarely in modern times has a novelist found the voice to tell his people the daring,...
- Nobel Humor For absurdity, this article on the Nobel Prize can’t be beat. (via Lit Saloon) There is something smarmy (or perhaps merely pathetic) about a writer...
- Nobel Amazon Watch Okay, Nobel winner Elfriede Jelinek has officially “cha-ching”ed. Here’s a breakdown of her current Amazon sales ranks: The Piano Teacher: 23 Lust: 50 Women as...
- NYTBR Interviewed There is a LOT of food for thought here, where the Lit Saloon responds to an interview with four prominent members of the NYTBR staff....
- Does the Nobel Sell? The Literary Saloon has an interesting post about the lethargy with which Knopf has brought out 2002 Nobel winner Imre Kert√©sz’s books: Remember Imre Kert√©sz,...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

















On Joining Oulipo by Accident





The Names by Don DeLillo (1982)
The Box Man by Kobo Abe (1973, English 1974)
Head in Flames by Lance Olsen (2009)
Agaat by Marlene van Niekerk (2006, English 2010)
The Weather Fifteen Years Ago by Wolf Haas (2006, English 2009)
Well, what about this – Jelinek has written libretto for an opera based on David Lynch’s Lost Highway and she has also translated Gravity’s Rainbow. She occasionally writes about American politics as well, one of her plays was also about president bush & co. The insularity mentioned in the statement is intellectual and cultural insularity not the lack of sociability. The original statement is still pretty stupid though.
William Vollman is an example of a politically engaged writer who is anything but a typically insular American, which is why he is going to win a Nobel in the next ten years. Bet on it.
Alok,
I never claimed that Jelinek wasn’t a worldly person. Quite the opposite–if she got a Nobel under the current regime then she must appeal to the judges on the basis of having a wide political reach.
My point was that if a shut-in can find out enough about the world to impress the Nobel committee, then said committee shouldn’t be so fast to claim that no American writers can write well on global matters.
God, there are so many American writers that deserve serious recognition: Roth, Jorie Graham, Hass, Ashberry, etc. and on and on. Pynchon? and god bless him, MR. Infinite Jest should have been heading there. Ridiculous comment that maybe says more than it intended to.
The indignation following the comment in the english newpapers and blohosphere amply underscores what Engdahl meant. Well done. Jorie Graham indeed.
*blogosphere