Yeah, I have no idea what to make of this. The book is The Marriage Plot, out in October. I hope that means they still have time to completely change the cover.
Leonard Bankhead is a philosophy double major who chews tobacco, wears a bandanna, disdains ironic detachment, and has a history of mental illness that has led to multiple hospitalizations — just like David Foster Wallace. (Also, like Infinite Jest’s Hal Incandenza, Bankhead self-medicates through out high school with marijuana.) Certainly, Leonard is distinct from DFW in a number of ways as well — the particularities of his family situation, his being a total stud, that he’s a manic-depressive, not just a depressive, that he’s not a writer, and all the vagaries of the plot — but the similarities are so iconically David Foster Wallace (a bandanna and chew are not common accoutrements) that Eugenides, who did not have a well-known or documented friendship with Foster Wallace, must intentionally be calling him to mind.
Here’s how Bankhead is introduced, in a semiotics class he’s taking with Madeleine. Like Foster Wallace, he’s a double major in philosophy and a hard science (in Foster Wallace’s case it was philosophy and math English, though he wrote a book about math) and he dips chew. You can find this in one of the New Yorker excerpts.
“He said in a quiet voice that he was a double major (biology and philosophy) and had never taken a semiotics course before, that his parents had named him Leonard…. After he finished his coffee, he dug into his right snowmobile boot and, to Madeleine’s surprise, pulled out a tin of chewing tobacco. With two stained fingers, he placed a wad of tobacco in his cheek. For the next two hours, every minute or so, he spat, discreetly but audibly, into the cup.
Leonard is also interested in subjects that interested Foster Wallace. . . .
Oh, and is The Recognitions seriously, “falling out of the canon faster than John Dos Passos”? Kinda thought Gaddis was experiencing a little bit of respect finally, though, National Book Awards notwithstanding, I don’t think he was ever particularly “canonical.”
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading:
- DeLillo Character Reviews David Foster Wallace A character from multiple DeLillo novels, has written a critique of Wallace’s work. The author is Jay Murray Siskind, probably best-known as the professor...
- The Logical David Foster Wallace The Boston Review considers David Foster Wallace's recently published thesis as well as his 2005 commencement address: . . . continue reading, and add your...
- David Foster Wallace in Tin House The current Tin House has fiction by David Foster Wallace: “THE PLANET TRILLAPHON AS IT STANDS IN RELATION TO THE BAD THING.” Not sure what...
- VIDEO: New BBC David Foster Wallace Documentary 45 minute DFW documentary from the BBC. Need I say more? Surely you have 45 minutes . . . . . . continue reading, and...
- David Foster Wallace (1962 – 2008) This is a terrible, terrible, terrible occasion. For years and years he gazed into the foulest depths of depression and despair for us, and he...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

















Why Is Everyone Reviewing HHhH?
Naked Singularity Big Read Schedule
More on Bolano’s Journalist





The Names by Don DeLillo (1982)
The Box Man by Kobo Abe (1973, English 1974)
Head in Flames by Lance Olsen (2009)
Agaat by Marlene van Niekerk (2006, English 2010)
The Weather Fifteen Years Ago by Wolf Haas (2006, English 2009)
Hmm, I think that if The Recognitions fell out of the canon it would make a nice satisfying THUMP and continue to fascinate and inspire in canonical indifference.
[...] manic depressive named Leonard. Sounds lackluster, though Adams is bullish on it. And Leonard is based on David Foster Wallace. So there’s that. [Get this [...]