Favorite Reads of 2015: #6 Political Order and Political Decay by Francis Fukuyama

Have a look at all of my favorite reads of 2015.

There are very few books that I read this year, or in any other year, that are as humbling as this one. Francis Fukuyama’s Political Order and Political Decay is truly the work of a master scholar who has dedicated a lifetime to his task and has marshaled decades of learning and research in order to make a lasting statement about human societies.

The inquiry of this book can be state simply: Fukuyama simply wants to know why in some places the political order remains solid and enduring, while in others it is nearly impossible to maintain, always crumbling and melting away to chaos.

His answer is much more complex to explain, although the general thesis can be summed up: societies that have succeeded in building certain modern institutions can enjoy a steady political order, whereas others that depend on more traditional forms of organization find it difficult to do so. Note that “modern institutions” does not necessarily mean 20th-century states: one of Fukuyama’s key examples is ancient China, which he indeed identifies as one of the world’s first successful states.

Once Fukuyama has explained his theory of why some states thrive and others decay, he then relentlessly examines state after state after state: imperial Germany, 19th- and 20th-century America, Britain, France, Denmark, Argentina, Costa Rica, Nigeria . . . The erudition in this volume is immense, and part of the joy of this book is simply reading all of the fascinating case-studies and learning about far-flung parts of the Earth.

This book is really for anyone who wants to understand what sorts of political orders human beings seem predisposed to, both of the successful kind and of the failing. It is for those curious about why civilization exists at all, why some have become great, and why some in our own era, including the one from within which I today write, seem to be failing.

It is also a book to make many literary writers more comprehensible, or at least to complement their own inquiries. On that score, I would say it would sit well beside, for example: László Krasznahorkai, W.G. Sebald, Wolfgang Hilbig, Thomas Mann. Read it beside Ton Judt’s Postwar.

Recent Posts

Criticism Isn't Free

CR is dedicated to thoughtful, in-depth criticism without regard to what's commercially appealing. It takes tens of hours each month to provide this. Please help make this sort of writing sustainable, either with a subscription or a one-time donation. Thank you!

You could also purchase one of my acclaimed ebooks.


Got Something To Say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Anything comparable to Post-War is definitely worth checking out. I know of Fukuyama mostly through people scoffing at his “History is Over” thesis, which I, admittedly, never read. Does he come to revise this theory in the new book?

My guess is he never meant it to be so simplistic and that it was probably ripped out of context by people trying to digest a historical moment…


Fukuyama’s “end of history” statement has been widely overblown. In the original context it makes a lot of sense and was probably more or less correct.

For a good discussion of that book & where this project fits in to that framework, read this essay: http://thepointmag.com/2015/politics/forward-with-fukuyama


The Surrender is Veronica Scott Esposito’s “collection of facts” concerning how she embraced her true gender.


Two long essays of 10,000 words each on sex in—and out of—literature . . .

The first essay dives in to Nicholson Baker’s “sex trilogy,” explaining just what Baker is up to here and why these books ultimately fail to be as sexy as Baker might wish.

From there the book moves on to the second essay, which explains just why Spaniard Javier Marías does right what Baker does wrong . . .


5 essays. 2 interviews.

All in all, over 25,000 words of Latin American literary goodness.

3 never-before-published essays, including “The Digression”—a 4,000-word piece on the most important digression in César Aira’s career.

Shop though these links = Support this site

Copyright © 2018. Powered by WordPress & Romangie Theme.