The End of Oulipo?

The End of Oulipo? My book (co-authored with Lauren Elkin), published by Zero Books. Available everywhere. Order it from Amazon, or find it in bookstores nationwide. The End of Oulipo

Lady Chatterley’s Brother

Lady Chatterley's Brother. The first ebook in the new TQC Long Essays series, Lady Chatterley's Brothercalled “an exciting new project” by Chad Post of Open Letter and Three Percent. Why can't Nicholson Baker write about sex? And why can Javier Marias? We investigate why porn is a dead end, and why seduction paves the way for the sex writing of the future. Read an excerpt.

Available now from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and direct from this site:


Translate This Book!

Ever wonder what English is missing? Called "a fascinating Life Perecread" by The New Yorker, Translate This Book! brings together over 40 of the top translators, publishers, and authors to tell us what books need to be published in English. Get it on Kindle.

For low prices on Las Vegas shows visit LasVegas.ShowTickets.com

You Say

Group Reads

The Tunnel

Fall Read: The Tunnel by William H. Gass

A group read of the book that either "engenders awe and despair" or "[goads] the reader with obscenity and bigotry," or both. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Naked Singularity

Summer Read: A Naked Singularity by Sergio De La Pava

Fans of Gaddis, Pynchon, DeLillo: A group read of the book that went from Xlibris to the University of Chicago Press. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Life Perec

Life A User's Manual by Georges Perec

Starting March 2011, read the greatest novel from an experimental master. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Last Samurai

Fall Read: The Last Samurai by Helen DeWitt

A group read of one of the '00s most-lauded postmodern novels. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Tale of Genji

The Summer of Genji

Two great online lit magazines team up to read a mammoth court drama, the world's first novel.

Your Face Tomorrow

Your Face This Spring

A 3-month read of Javier Marias' mammoth book Your Face Tomorrow

Shop though these links = Support this site


Ten Memorable Quotes from William Gaddis’ Letters

New Books
Here are ten of my favorite moments from these hugely interesting letters.


Interviews from Conversational Reading

New Books
See this page for interviews with leading authors, translators, publishers, and more.


  • Nostalgia June 15, 2014
    Few habits are as prone to affliction, or as vulnerable to an ordeal, as the bent of a peddler’s consciousness. Placeless, the peddler completes an untold number of transactions; there are ideas to conduct (through language, which can transact a mind) and feelings to certify (through tasks, repeated interminably). […]
  • Why Literary Periods Mattered by Ted Underwood June 15, 2014
    There are some writers who are, and likely always will be, inextricably linked to the “period” with which their work is associated, and in many cases helped to define. Surely Wordsworth and Keats will always be “Romantic” poets, while Faulkner and Woolf will remain modernists, as the term “modern” has been fully appropriated to describe the historical era be […]
  • Trans-Atlantyk by Witold Gombrowicz June 15, 2014
    August 1939. You sail to Buenos Aires on the Chombry as a cultural ambassador of Poland. Why say no to a little holiday on the government’s tab? Soon after arriving you sense that something isn’t right. You emerge from a welcome reception and your ears are “filled with newspaper cries: ‘Polonia, Polonia,’ most irksome indeed.” Before you’ve even had a chance […]
  • Accepting the Disaster by Joshua Mehigan June 15, 2014
    The first collections of most young poets, even the better ones, carry with them a hint of bravado. Flush with recognition, vindicated by the encouraging attentions of at least one editor and three blurbists, the poet strikes a triumphant pose and high-fives the Muse: “We did it, baby.” When Joshua Mehigan published his impressive first collection, The Optim […]
  • The Histories of Herodotus, translated by Tom Holland June 15, 2014
    Two of the greatest of Tom Holland's predecessors in translating Herodotus are Victorian scholar George Rawlinson and Aubrey de Selincourt; the former translated Herodotus in 1860, making an enormous hit (despite the fact that its detractors often referred to it as “dull and prolix"), while the latter's 1954 Herodotus was another enormous hit, […]
  • Bullfight by Yasushi Inoue June 15, 2014
    The premise of Yasushi Inoue's debut novella Bullfight, celebrated in Japan as a classic of postwar literature, is unassuming enough: an evening newspaper sponsors a tournament of the regional sport of bull-sumo. As practical and financial issues arise, the paper's young editor-in-chief, Tsugami, soon realizes he has taken on more than he can handl […]
  • Sworn Virgin by Elvira Dones June 15, 2014
    Sworn Virgin was made to be translated. Elvira Dones wrote this book not in her native language of Albanian but in Italian—a necessarily fraught and complicated decision. In an Italian-language interview with Pierre Lepori, Dones speaks about her choice of language: “Sworn Virgin was born in Italian . . . I’ve lived using Italian for nineteen years, it has s […]
  • On the Letters of David Markson June 15, 2014
    Knowing these narrators and how their lives paralleled David’s own, it’s difficult to deny his being a recluse. I certainly held that image of him, and nursed it, secretly cherishing it because it meant I was one of the few people with whom he corresponded, and with whom he would occasionally meet. Arranging our first meetings in person was something of a ni […]
  • Storm Still by Peter Handke June 15, 2014
    Storm Still (Immer Noch Sturm) does not necessarily represent new terrain for Handke. Originally published by Suhrkamp Verlag in 2010 and now available for English-language readers thanks to Martin Chalmers’ fluent translation, the play chronicles the dissolution of the Svinec family, a family of Carinthian Slovenes—a quasi-fictionalized version of Handke’s […]
  • Red or Dead by David Peace June 15, 2014
    David Peace's novel Red or Dead is about British football, but it partakes in the traits of Homer's epic. This is a novel about the place of myth and heroes in modern society, about how the cyclical rhythms of athletic seasons reflect the cyclical patterns of life. It is a book about honor and fate, and one which bridges the profound, dreamlike ter […]

First Review of The Kindly Ones by Jonathan Littell

If you know just one thing about translated literature in 2009, it’s probably that French mega-novel Les Bienveillantes (The Kindly Ones) is publishing in English this year. Expectations are high, especially after 2666 has primed us for enormous novels in translation.

Bookforum (which continues to snub 2666 without explanation) gets in an early review of The Kindly Ones, and although the review is positive in tone, there’s not much here to convince me that I need to wade through these 992 pages. Reviewer Leland de la Durantaye duly states that the plot is "brilliantly organized and written," although I see nothing in the review to convince me of that fact.

The book’s animating question, as described by de la Durantaye, similarly leaves me wanting:

The reader faces a powerful if implicit question: What if those we condemn did not select evil at one particular moment but, instead, found themselves in a situation where all options seemed bad, where a compromising choice was made, followed by another and another as the slope became too slippery for them to climb their way back? This does not constitute innocence, but it does demand a different answer to the question of why men and women treated their human brothers and sisters as they did.

Of course this question is hardly novel, even if you limit the field to WWII books. While it’s possible that The Kindly Ones might bring something new to this matter, there’s nothing in the Bookforum review to make me believe that.

I’ll remain open-minded about The Kindly Ones, but this first review doesn’t make a good impression.

You Might Also Like:

More from Conversational Reading:

  1. 2666 Review at Seminary Co-Op Quarterly Conversation contributor Levi Stahl has published a review of 2666, and it’s a pretty good one. 2666 is another iteration of Bolaño’s increasingly baroque,...
  2. New Bookforum I see there is a new Bookforum available. Bookforum has the distinction of being one of a very small number of print journals that I...
  3. First 2666 Review Adam Kirsch in Slate has the first review I’ve seen for 2666. I imagine this kind of opening will become pretty standard fare in the...
  4. Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell Invasion Begins The Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell reviews are coming fast and furious. The NYTimes and The Washington Post have allocated space in their Sunday book...
  5. New Boston Review With heavyweights BookForum and NYRB dropping new issues this week, it’s easy to miss out on the Boston Review’s new issue. But don’t. May I...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

5 comments to First Review of The Kindly Ones by Jonathan Littell

  • JPS

    I read the first hundred pages or so of this book when it was first published in French. I felt that Littell’s first great mistake was to cram as much of his research as possible onto the page, to the extent that the texture of the prose was dry and uninvolving, and the story hence lacked any true narrative drive. He hadn’t taken the time, it seems, to have absorbed and chosen more critically what was useful to his story and to cast aside what wasn’t.
    His second mistake, or rather sin, was of pride. One sensed that he felt he was writing a great, “important” book, and this can easily blind the reader to the flaws of the book. Note I said that I’d read a hundred pages. I didn’t honestly see any point in going on.

  • H.S.

    Haven’t we pretty much covered the whole Monsters = Real People Just Like You And Me thing? I get it. If Littell wanted to address the whole Nazi question in a more provacative way he should’ve taken Bolano’s strategy from 2666: 992 pages of one atrocity after the next with no psychoanalyzing (that’s not a word, is it?). Pointing out the banality of evil is getting tired. What we need to do is reinvigorate the atrocities that the Nazi’s committed, not flatten them out. And right now, it seems like the only way to reinvigorate things is to present them as unimpeachable facts within the context of fiction.

  • JPS

    H.S.: I’m not sure how much of 2666 you’ve read, but it’s not 992 pages of one atrocity after another. It’s a novel composed of five separate parts or books, and one of them deals specifically with the crimes in St. Teresa. Contrary to what some reviewers have said, this isn’t a litany of crime scenes and autopsies; the narrative contains recurring characters (such as a policeman and an American profiler).
    I don’t think the issue with Littell really is about what he can point out or what he cannot. As a novelist, he has his point of view and his both global and more specific intentions in writing this book. I’m not sure how much of it you’ve read, but for me the issue, as a novelist reading another novelist, was how well (or otherwise) he brought his narrator to life and how well he’d integrated his research into the narrative.
    As for the atrocities, Les Bienveillants contains enough of them to satisfy anyone seeking them out, believe me. His facts are, in fact, unimpeachable, as they come from archives and the historical record. It’s his abilities as a novelist, an artist, that remain in question.

  • H.S.

    I was only referring to the St. Teresa portion of 2666. If was to write a novel about The Holocaust I would use that section as a template for how to approach what the Nazis did. That’s all I was trying to say. That I’m getting tired of the angle a lot of writers are approaching the Holocaust from. Yes, we know, these were regular people, just like you and me, etc, etc. I would argue that the reason this approach is so popular right now is because the West, America specifically, is trying to rationalize what we have done in Iraq. We were just doing what we were told to do, right? Isn’t that always the argument? At one time, I guess, this was a novel approach to genocide, but now it’s just starting to sound like an excuse, a collective shrug of the shoulders.
    I know this has nothing to do with your post or the book or anything. But this is what your post made me think about.

  • BippBopp

    “As for the atrocities, Les Bienveillants contains enough of them to satisfy anyone seeking them out, believe me.”
    Not really, they’re actually few and far between.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>