My review of Funeral for a Dog by Thomas Pletzinger has been published at The National.
My short take: this is a very strong first novel, albeit with a few first novel problems. But it’s one of those books good enough and innovative enough to make you want to engage all the way–i.e. to the point that you care about the flaws. (With the majority of books one never gets to the point of caring about the flaws, because why waste time with dull things?)
Also, much praise to translator Ross Benjamin. The book is formally ambitious and grammatically inconsistent. I imagine it must have been tough to translate. There are also two very particular, very distinct narrative voices in this book, and they read very well.
And now a quote from the review:
There are two well-worn paths to literary innovation: tell a story that is unlike any other, or tell a very common story, but do it in a way that has never been tried before. Funeral for a Dog, the debut novel by the German author Thomas Pletzinger, does a little of both. Its aspirations to tell a new story are announced in its epigraph, a quote from Max Frisch admonishing those who claim that all possible love stories have already been told. Likewise, the book’s opening pages – a series of fragmentary postcards written just after the plot of the novel ends – immediately declare Pletzinger’s intentions to tell this story in an innovative way.
Much of the fun of Funeral for a Dog is watching Pletzinger attempt to rise to these two challenges, which he does with some success . . .
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading:
- Funeral for a Dog Interview I'm currently reading Funeral for a Dog by Thomas Pletzinger for a review. So, I don't want to say too much about it, but it...
- The One-Sentence Zone Review It was bound to happen, and Garth Risk Hallberg has done it. A few thoughts: I'm not one for taking the form of my review...
- New Review @ TQC: Shadowplay by Norman Lock Just in time for Thanksgiving, read our review of Shadowplay by Norman Lock, from the estimable Ellipsis Press: With his short novel Shadowplay, Norman Lock...
- Sotiropoulos’s Modernist Surfaces At The Quarterly Conversation we’ve just published George Fragopoulos’s review of Landscape With Dog: And Other Stories by Ersi Sotiropoulos. Landscape is a collection that...
- How's the New Paris Review? Philip Gourevitch took the helm of The Paris Review a little over a year ago. The Washtington Post says he’s doing well. I’m not so...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

















Why Is Everyone Reviewing HHhH?
Naked Singularity Big Read Schedule
More on Bolano’s Journalist





The Names by Don DeLillo (1982)
The Box Man by Kobo Abe (1973, English 1974)
Head in Flames by Lance Olsen (2009)
Agaat by Marlene van Niekerk (2006, English 2010)
The Weather Fifteen Years Ago by Wolf Haas (2006, English 2009)
Scott, would you mind writing out the Frisch quote? I’ve enjoyed the two works of his I’ve read — have been considering starting Homo Faber — and don’t immediately recall such a line from those, so I’m damned interested.
Also, I don’t know if it is just me, but the links don’t seem to work, and went I went to the National’s site, I couldn’t find the review. Is the online updating simply maybe behind?
PT:
This is it. It doesn’t mention a source.
“(On love as a relationship between the sexes there is nothing new to report, literature has depicted it in all its variations, once and for all, it is no longer a subject for literature that is worthy of the name–such pronouncements are being made; they fail to recognize that the relation between the sexes changes, that other love stories will take place.)”
Dunno about the webpage. Was working, appears to not be now. Maybe give it a day or two . . .
Thanks for the quote Scott. Interesting timing on it, considering I just saw a review of Frisch’s first novel go up over at Three Percent.