Lady Chatterley’s Brother Lady Chatterley's Brother. The first ebook in the new TQC Long Essays series,  called “an exciting new project” by Chad Post of Open Letter and Three Percent. Why can't Nicholson Baker write about sex? And why can Javier Marias? We investigate why porn is a dead end, and why seduction paves the way for the sex writing of the future. Read an excerpt.
Available now from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and direct from this site:
Translate This Book! Ever wonder what English is missing? Called "a fascinating  read" by The New Yorker, Translate This Book! brings together over 40 of the top translators, publishers, and authors to tell us what books need to be published in English. Get it on Kindle.
|
Shop though these links = Support this site
Interviews from Conversational Reading See this page for interviews with leading authors, translators, publishers, and more.
|
JG Ballard: Not the Last Modernist
Stephen Mitchelmore takes offense to loose "last modernist" talk:
Rhys Tranter has posted several blogs
in response to the death of JG Ballard. So far I have managed to avoid
comment. However, the latest links to Chris Petit's appreciation The Last Modernist and now I have something to say.
What is it with this title? In 1996, Anthony Cronin published The Last Modernist, a biography of Beckett and, three years ago, James Wood wrote an article about Henry Green entitled The last English Modernist (to which I responded
at the time). We can assume it's a muted overstatement to assert the
importance of a writer even when writing – certainly in these three
cases – means the erasure of the author as a distinct personality. Here
though, in its blithely confident use, it reveals the anxiety with
which British literary culture regards modernism (the case, by the way,
is lower to maintain the present tense).
Stephen then goes on to contest the use of modernity in Ballard's fiction:
In their novels, both Ballard and Amis raise a terrible caricature that might be called modern life
and might thereby be called modernistic. Yet why isn't writing also
subject to modernity as much as "our psyches"? In both appreciations,
the writers demonstrate their own distance from the caricature. They
are able to remove themselves from modernity in order to explain why
its fictional presentation is worth celebrating. What does this tell us
about the reach of modernity?
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading: - Friday Column: Mann, Faustus, and the Modernist Morality (When I decided to discuss Thomas Mann’s novel Doctor Faustus on this blog, it quickly became clear that I could expend thousands and thousands of...
- Beckett Lectures on Literature The Guaridan: In 1961 an American academic, Tom Driver, quizzed Samuel Beckett about the confusion he found in his writing. Beckett replied: "The confusion is...
- Inescapable Ecologies Jon Christensen in the SF Chronicle: In most histories of science and medicine, modern germ theory triumphs over older environmental conceptions of disease. But Nash...
- Poll Results You guys don’t like Michiko. 55% of you called her the NYTimes’s worst critic. 33% went with Janet Maslin (the correct answer) and only 13%...
- Willa Cather In The Guardian, A.S. Byatt makes the case for Willa Cather, whom she says has been unfairly neglected. She was a successful journalist and...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Leave a Reply
|
Recommended Books DeLillo's major work before White Noise is probably his most underrated novel. Its all right here--the politics of paranoia, terrorism, the unnamable--set in an evocative, timeless Greece.
The most bizarre Abe novel I've yet read, which is indeed saying something. About a subclass of Japanese men who go around wearing boxes from the waist up (and then use them as domiciles in the evening), the book is also an experiment in perspective shifts, a highly unstable, metafictional first-person narrative, and an exploration of voyeurism, consumerism, and aberrant sexuality.
Charting the path to three gunshots--the one that killed filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, the one that disabled his Islamic extremist assassin, Mohammed Bouyeri, and the one that led to Vincent Van Gogh’s one hundred years earlier--Olsen tells three separate stories that resonate with one another on numerous levels: the logic of extremism, the role of the dissident in Dutch society, the limits of tolerance, the purpose of the artist, the feeling of the most important five minutes of your life. Read my interview with the author.
Creatively structured, well-executed epic novel of rural South Africa from 1950 - 2000. Takes on a lot and lives up to it magnificently. Highly recommended.
A book that's an interview about the book you're supposedly holding in your hands. Creative, potent, and full of life. Just what metafiction should be. Read my post on it.
|
You Say