Nicholson Baker Explains What Happened to Criticism

Read these interviews, people.

JCH: As you see it, what happened to criticism? That is, how did we move from Arnold and Pater and Wilde to the kind of academic criticism produced in Literature departments?

NB: What happened was that people like Pater and Swinburne overdid the rapture and tired everyone out. The idea grew up that we had to set aside our likes and dislikes, and even our knowledge of biographical context—and sometimes that impulse was helpful. New Criticism and Close Reading aspired to be a little like the f/64 school of photography, where everything was in focus. No softness, no mists of emotion. Panovsky was searching for iconographical symbols with a magnifying glass, and I.A. Richards was, if I remember right, making diagrams that supposedly demonstrated the neurological effects triggered by lines of poetry. After a few decades of poking at lyrical joys with the tools of forensic prose, we’d had enough of pseudo-objectivity and instead spiraled out into the deep dark-mattered space of Franco-Grecian vocabularies and learned, humorless puns. Now there are fewer English majors, and we’re back to square one—reading and writing reviews, celebrating and spurning.

More from Conversational Reading:

  1. The Dialogue in Today’s Criticism If you are not doing it already, please read JC Hallman’s series of interviews with critics at Tin House. They are a great source of...
  2. Thoughts on Criticism J.C. Hallman, editor of The Story About the Story Vol. II, is doing a series of interviews with contributors to the book. These are great...
  3. Whatever Happened to Modernism? The title of this post is a means for acknowledging the title of Gabriel Josipovici’s newest book of criticism, Whatever Happened to Modernism?, which touched...
  4. Nicholson Baker: On Hearing Voices and Seeing Places You’ve Never Been (This week I’m covering the International Festival of Authors in Toronto. This event is On Hearing Voices and Seeing Places You’ve Never Been, featuring Nicholson...
  5. On Shklovsky and Defamiliarization, with Reference to The Mezzanine by Nicholson Baker Given the recent conversation about plot and the novel, I thought it was worthwhile to refresh Viktor Shklovsky's thoughts on defamiliarization. This is as quoted...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.


Criticism Isn't Free


CR is dedicated to thoughtful, in-depth criticism without regard to what's commercially appealing. It takes tens of hours each month to provide this. Please help make this sort of writing sustainable, either with a subscription or a one-time donation. Thank you!





Got Something To Say:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Shop though these links = Support this site

Copyright © 2015. Powered by WordPress & Romangie Theme.