<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay Walls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conversationalreading.com/pay-walls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conversationalreading.com/pay-walls/</link>
	<description>Since 2004. The blog of the critic, writer, and editor, Scott Esposito</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel E. Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://conversationalreading.com/pay-walls/#comment-4045</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel E. Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationalreading.com/?p=7003#comment-4045</guid>
		<description>What media companies need to do is to start creating content-oriented web ads; snippits of articles or top headlines. The tech is all there for this sort of thing but I don&#039;t see it, not much at least. Most of their ads think in print.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What media companies need to do is to start creating content-oriented web ads; snippits of articles or top headlines. The tech is all there for this sort of thing but I don&#8217;t see it, not much at least. Most of their ads think in print.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Esposito</title>
		<link>http://conversationalreading.com/pay-walls/#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Esposito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationalreading.com/?p=7003#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>Bradley,

On this I&#039;m totally with you. I can&#039;t believe that at $6/year Harper&#039;s wouldn&#039;t do better to just open up the archives and earn from ads.

That&#039;s different, though, from the point above, which was in regards to not being in the conversation because of a pay wall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bradley,</p>
<p>On this I&#8217;m totally with you. I can&#8217;t believe that at $6/year Harper&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t do better to just open up the archives and earn from ads.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s different, though, from the point above, which was in regards to not being in the conversation because of a pay wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradley Robb</title>
		<link>http://conversationalreading.com/pay-walls/#comment-4043</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradley Robb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationalreading.com/?p=7003#comment-4043</guid>
		<description>Archives are where news sites generate most of their ad revenue. They&#039;ve matured in the Google system and are most likely net readers with a propensity to click. Regular readers of a site are known to have &quot;ad blindness&quot; - as in they know where the content is and simply skim right over adverts in a desire to stay on the site.

Not arguing against the Harper&#039;s Paywall, just saying that it&#039;s probably costing them more money than it&#039;s bringing in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Archives are where news sites generate most of their ad revenue. They&#8217;ve matured in the Google system and are most likely net readers with a propensity to click. Regular readers of a site are known to have &#8220;ad blindness&#8221; &#8211; as in they know where the content is and simply skim right over adverts in a desire to stay on the site.</p>
<p>Not arguing against the Harper&#8217;s Paywall, just saying that it&#8217;s probably costing them more money than it&#8217;s bringing in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

