The End of Oulipo?

The End of Oulipo? My book (co-authored with Lauren Elkin), published by Zero Books. Available everywhere. Order it from Amazon, or find it in bookstores nationwide. The End of Oulipo

Lady Chatterley’s Brother

Lady Chatterley's Brother. The first ebook in the new TQC Long Essays series, Lady Chatterley's Brothercalled “an exciting new project” by Chad Post of Open Letter and Three Percent. Why can't Nicholson Baker write about sex? And why can Javier Marias? We investigate why porn is a dead end, and why seduction paves the way for the sex writing of the future. Read an excerpt.

Available now from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and direct from this site:


Translate This Book!

Ever wonder what English is missing? Called "a fascinating Life Perecread" by The New Yorker, Translate This Book! brings together over 40 of the top translators, publishers, and authors to tell us what books need to be published in English. Get it on Kindle.

For low prices on Las Vegas shows visit LasVegas.ShowTickets.com

You Say

Group Reads

The Tunnel

Fall Read: The Tunnel by William H. Gass

A group read of the book that either "engenders awe and despair" or "[goads] the reader with obscenity and bigotry," or both. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Naked Singularity

Summer Read: A Naked Singularity by Sergio De La Pava

Fans of Gaddis, Pynchon, DeLillo: A group read of the book that went from Xlibris to the University of Chicago Press. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Life Perec

Life A User's Manual by Georges Perec

Starting March 2011, read the greatest novel from an experimental master. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Last Samurai

Fall Read: The Last Samurai by Helen DeWitt

A group read of one of the '00s most-lauded postmodern novels. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Tale of Genji

The Summer of Genji

Two great online lit magazines team up to read a mammoth court drama, the world's first novel.

Your Face Tomorrow

Your Face This Spring

A 3-month read of Javier Marias' mammoth book Your Face Tomorrow

Shop though these links = Support this site


Ten Memorable Quotes from William Gaddis’ Letters

New Books
Here are ten of my favorite moments from these hugely interesting letters.


Interviews from Conversational Reading

New Books
See this page for interviews with leading authors, translators, publishers, and more.


  • Nostalgia June 15, 2014
    Few habits are as prone to affliction, or as vulnerable to an ordeal, as the bent of a peddler’s consciousness. Placeless, the peddler completes an untold number of transactions; there are ideas to conduct (through language, which can transact a mind) and feelings to certify (through tasks, repeated interminably). […]
  • Why Literary Periods Mattered by Ted Underwood June 15, 2014
    There are some writers who are, and likely always will be, inextricably linked to the “period” with which their work is associated, and in many cases helped to define. Surely Wordsworth and Keats will always be “Romantic” poets, while Faulkner and Woolf will remain modernists, as the term “modern” has been fully appropriated to describe the historical era be […]
  • Trans-Atlantyk by Witold Gombrowicz June 15, 2014
    August 1939. You sail to Buenos Aires on the Chombry as a cultural ambassador of Poland. Why say no to a little holiday on the government’s tab? Soon after arriving you sense that something isn’t right. You emerge from a welcome reception and your ears are “filled with newspaper cries: ‘Polonia, Polonia,’ most irksome indeed.” Before you’ve even had a chance […]
  • Accepting the Disaster by Joshua Mehigan June 15, 2014
    The first collections of most young poets, even the better ones, carry with them a hint of bravado. Flush with recognition, vindicated by the encouraging attentions of at least one editor and three blurbists, the poet strikes a triumphant pose and high-fives the Muse: “We did it, baby.” When Joshua Mehigan published his impressive first collection, The Optim […]
  • The Histories of Herodotus, translated by Tom Holland June 15, 2014
    Two of the greatest of Tom Holland's predecessors in translating Herodotus are Victorian scholar George Rawlinson and Aubrey de Selincourt; the former translated Herodotus in 1860, making an enormous hit (despite the fact that its detractors often referred to it as “dull and prolix"), while the latter's 1954 Herodotus was another enormous hit, […]
  • Bullfight by Yasushi Inoue June 15, 2014
    The premise of Yasushi Inoue's debut novella Bullfight, celebrated in Japan as a classic of postwar literature, is unassuming enough: an evening newspaper sponsors a tournament of the regional sport of bull-sumo. As practical and financial issues arise, the paper's young editor-in-chief, Tsugami, soon realizes he has taken on more than he can handl […]
  • Sworn Virgin by Elvira Dones June 15, 2014
    Sworn Virgin was made to be translated. Elvira Dones wrote this book not in her native language of Albanian but in Italian—a necessarily fraught and complicated decision. In an Italian-language interview with Pierre Lepori, Dones speaks about her choice of language: “Sworn Virgin was born in Italian . . . I’ve lived using Italian for nineteen years, it has s […]
  • On the Letters of David Markson June 15, 2014
    Knowing these narrators and how their lives paralleled David’s own, it’s difficult to deny his being a recluse. I certainly held that image of him, and nursed it, secretly cherishing it because it meant I was one of the few people with whom he corresponded, and with whom he would occasionally meet. Arranging our first meetings in person was something of a ni […]
  • Storm Still by Peter Handke June 15, 2014
    Storm Still (Immer Noch Sturm) does not necessarily represent new terrain for Handke. Originally published by Suhrkamp Verlag in 2010 and now available for English-language readers thanks to Martin Chalmers’ fluent translation, the play chronicles the dissolution of the Svinec family, a family of Carinthian Slovenes—a quasi-fictionalized version of Handke’s […]
  • Red or Dead by David Peace June 15, 2014
    David Peace's novel Red or Dead is about British football, but it partakes in the traits of Homer's epic. This is a novel about the place of myth and heroes in modern society, about how the cyclical rhythms of athletic seasons reflect the cyclical patterns of life. It is a book about honor and fate, and one which bridges the profound, dreamlike ter […]

The Debate Just Got Stupid

We’ve been having a nice little conversation about the role of negative reviews in literary culture, thanks to Jacob Silverman’s piece in Slate. Alas, now Laura Miller has joined in.

After arguing that we now live in a world where even incredibly successful novelists like Jonathan Franzen are relatively obscure (since so few people care about serious fiction), Miller attempts to build a case for reviews as something that help educated readers decide what to read. Then she writes:

But a negative or middling review of a literary novel that the reader would otherwise have never heard of and is unlikely to ever hear of again? No one needs to read such a thing, and furthermore, no one really wants to. (At Salon, we’ve got the numbers to prove that.) The idea that more negative reviews of such books — what Silverman calls “skeptical, cranky criticisms that may be painful for writers to experience” — will somehow benefit readers in general and “make for a vibrant, useful literary culture” strikes me as misguided. If the point is to educate the author’s fellow writers, then for God’s sake, take it to the classroom, workshop or specialty publication.

Two points here: first, Miller can’t have it both ways. If we do live in a world where only writers and highly educated readers know who James Wood is (as Miller claims), then, yes, these kinds of negative reviews are most definitely a benefit to readers and are a fit mode of communication with the writers who are surely reading them.

And secondly, she entirely ignores the fact that would-be critics like herself have become wholly owned subsidiaries of commercial New York publishing. Some honest, intelligent critiques of the fashionable authors of the moment would go a long way toward diminishing that opinion and restoring lost credibility. Unfortunately, I doubt Miller realizes how much people like herself and venues like Salon have lost status among people who actually care about books.

And well, three points: the argument isn’t for educating one’s fellow writers or for dissing the boutique writers. The argument is for having some standards when it comes to praising books. Silverman’s article was, at heart, a request that people who didn’t know what the hell they were talking about—or who were too quick to follow the crowd toward the next great thing—spend a little more time thinking whether a book really deserved the praise they were about to lavish on it.

Then there’s this, which is simply completely wrong:

Unless such a review is a spiteful slapdown engineered to gratify the unexamined resentments of the worst sort of reader, how welcome (let alone “useful”) can it really be? The kind of criticism that Garner respects, that “means talking about ideas, aesthetics and morality as if these things matter” is not especially illuminating to someone whose only knowledge of the work comes from the review itself. A close critical reading of a text can be revelatory indeed — but only when you’ve had a chance to read it, or other works by the same author, for yourself. “

So much of our literary tradition’s great criticism contradicts this statement that I must conclude that Miller is ignorant of the great critical works. Either that, or she read them and absorbed very little.

You Might Also Like:

More from Conversational Reading:

  1. It's the Books, Stupid I'm not quite as down on electronic reading devices as some, but this was still a welcome reminder. . . . continue reading, and add...
  2. Problems with Reviews Today I’m not too bothered about the backscratching, logrolling, etc that goes on in reviewing. If people are skeptical enough when they see a novelist on...
  3. 96 Percent Stupid Dalkey is getting some great coverage for their Gaddis re-releases. The New Yorker picks out a gem anecdote: William Gaddis, in the closing pages of...
  4. Brewing Richard Powers Debate I haven’t read The Echo Maker yet, so I can’t comment, but two bloggers have some words for William Deresiewicz after he slams The Echo...
  5. Stupid Praise Mark Lotto, i.e. the voice of sanity. Book reviewers, on the other hand, have had no trouble making up their minds about Indecision. The Gray...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

11 comments to The Debate Just Got Stupid

  • Iain

    For what it’s worth, here is the Canadian equivalent of this debate (it pre-dates more recent discussion, but received a parallel revival around the time of the Slate essay this summer). Jan Zwicky opened the doors for discussion some years ago: http://cwila.com/wordpress/an-essay-on-female-reviewing/ (Originally published in The Malahat Review No. 144, Fall 2003)

    The debate was given new life this past July: http://arts.nationalpost.com/2012/07/05/michael-lista-five-thoughts-on-jan-zwickys-response/ with this response.

  • Jack

    The headline alone made my day.

    Here’s a new well-written takedown; I imagine you’ve seen it, but in case not: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/books/review/inside-and-signs-and-wonders-by-alix-ohlin.html?pagewanted=all

  • Sawn

    I think a good example of a negative review is found in this week’s Ron Charles’ review at the Washington Post. Now, he probably isn’t someone Scott Esposito respects, as he usually just covers the latest mass market, semi-literary stuff – but he isn’t afraid to let a book he didn’t like have it. This week he rips up Jonathan Tropper’s newest, but at the same time offers something as an alternative that hasn’t been as Amazon hyped (Amahyped?). Thanks to Charles’ review last summer I picked up a book I thoroughly loved, but hadn’t heard about anywhere else – William Giraldi’s Busy Monsters.

  • admin

    I actually think Ron Charles is a great critic. He was one of the very few people to be honest about Freedom.

  • Sawn

    My apologies,I shouldn’t have made eird thatan assumption. I think it is freakishly weird that the review mentioned above of the Alix Ohlin books was by William Giraldi who I mentioned in my post. Total coincidence as I hadn’t read those comments when I made mine.
    In June Ohlin got an over the top review in Toronto’s The Globe and Mail, which I found quite curious at the time, maybe she fucked the guy?:
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/alix-ohlin-a-writer-who-should-be-famous/article4267001/

    • K

      Seriously? The only reason two reviewers might have different opinions about an author is if one of those critics was fucked by said author? I’ma call bullshit on that right now.

      • Sawn

        Yes, my comment was too men and sarcastic – especially since the individuals are probably not as well known outside of Canada. Alix Ohlin is the daughter of Peter Ohlin who taught at McGill and is a friend of T.F. Rigelhof who taught at Dawson (in Montreal)and who wrote the review in the Globe and Mail.

  • Laura Miller’s idea that a critical piece should be “welcome” or “useful” to be valid is pretty digusting. Why should the author’s opinion of the piece matter at all? I can’t understand why she puts that forth as a major argument against writing negative reviews.

    It’s a slight stretch, but it reminds me of helicopter parents and their incessant efforts to ensure their children remain shielded from negativity or consequences. How is this possibly helpful in the longer term? Do authors somehow write better when their egos are padded by facile reviews?

  • Jim

    Another important function of negative criticism is that, when done well, it provides an instructive model for how to read critically. Critics can help us to read better books, but they can also help us to read better, period. Sophisticated literacy involves questioning how the book that you’re reading succeeds or fails, and criticism provides a basis and provocation for such questioning. I can only assume that the folks who advocate against publishing negative criticism have a far less ambitious understanding of their discipline.

  • Sawn knows something about me I don’t know about myself. It’s probable that sometime in the past 30 some years somewhere on the island of Montreal at some public event or other I was introduced to Peter Ohlin but I honestly don’t remember where or when. We’ve never spoken on the phone or e-mailed. The review of Alex Ohlin’s book is the first time I’ve ever mentioned his name in print. The debate gets really stupid when people start inventing non-existent relationships.

  • [...] it ends up being widely circulated. And her response prompted a particularly abrasive response from Scott Esposito (though I might add that the terms of which the debate is framed was always-already stupid). Then [...]

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>