The End of Oulipo?

The End of Oulipo? My book (co-authored with Lauren Elkin), published by Zero Books. Available everywhere. Order it from Amazon, or find it in bookstores nationwide. The End of Oulipo

Lady Chatterley’s Brother

Lady Chatterley's Brother. The first ebook in the new TQC Long Essays series, Lady Chatterley's Brothercalled “an exciting new project” by Chad Post of Open Letter and Three Percent. Why can't Nicholson Baker write about sex? And why can Javier Marias? We investigate why porn is a dead end, and why seduction paves the way for the sex writing of the future. Read an excerpt.

Available now from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and direct from this site:


Translate This Book!

Ever wonder what English is missing? Called "a fascinating Life Perecread" by The New Yorker, Translate This Book! brings together over 40 of the top translators, publishers, and authors to tell us what books need to be published in English. Get it on Kindle.

For low prices on Las Vegas shows visit LasVegas.ShowTickets.com

You Say

Group Reads

The Tunnel

Fall Read: The Tunnel by William H. Gass

A group read of the book that either "engenders awe and despair" or "[goads] the reader with obscenity and bigotry," or both. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Naked Singularity

Summer Read: A Naked Singularity by Sergio De La Pava

Fans of Gaddis, Pynchon, DeLillo: A group read of the book that went from Xlibris to the University of Chicago Press. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Life Perec

Life A User's Manual by Georges Perec

Starting March 2011, read the greatest novel from an experimental master. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Last Samurai

Fall Read: The Last Samurai by Helen DeWitt

A group read of one of the '00s most-lauded postmodern novels. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Tale of Genji

The Summer of Genji

Two great online lit magazines team up to read a mammoth court drama, the world's first novel.

Your Face Tomorrow

Your Face This Spring

A 3-month read of Javier Marias' mammoth book Your Face Tomorrow

Shop though these links = Support this site


Ten Memorable Quotes from William Gaddis’ Letters

New Books
Here are ten of my favorite moments from these hugely interesting letters.


Interviews from Conversational Reading

New Books
See this page for interviews with leading authors, translators, publishers, and more.


  • A Legacy by Sybille Bedford March 15, 2015
    Sybille Bedford had the benefit—or bad fortune, however you see it—of being born into the German aristocracy in 1911. Her father was a retired lieutenant colonel and art collector from the agrarian south, from a Roman Catholic family in fiscal decline. Her mother came from a wealthy German-Jewish family from Hamburg. A widower from his first marriage, Bedfor […]
  • Reviving Antal Szerb March 15, 2015
    Antal Szerb’s lithe, lively, and wholly endearing fiction is peopled by male dreamers on spiritual journeys of self-discovery. Each one sets out on his respective mini-mission with good intentions but knows from the outset that there are only so many harsh truths he can withstand. In this respect, all Szerb’s protagonists seem to have heeded the advice of Gr […]
  • 39 Africans Walk into a Bar March 15, 2015
    New anthologies of African fiction seem to materialize virtually every year, if not more often in recent years. When presented with the physical fact of yet another new anthology of African fiction, the immediate question, one which I was asked when I pressed the warm, bound pages of the Africa39 anthology into the even warmer hands of a new acquaintance, wa […]
  • The Country Road by Regina Ullmann March 15, 2015
    This collection of short stories, her first to appear in English, counters material poverty with a fulfilling and deeply spiritual relationship with the natural world. Ullmann herself was no stranger to hardship. A depressive, she was plagued by personal and professional crises. Financial constraints forced her to send her illegitimate children to the countr […]
  • The Fall of Language in the Age of English by Minae Mizumura March 14, 2015
    The Fall of Language in the Age of English stirred up debate upon its publication in Japan in 2008, and it’s possible it will do so in the U.S. with its arrival in Mari Yoshihara and Juliet Winters Carpenter's translation. In their introduction, Yoshihara and Winters Carpenter, point out that Japanese reviewers accused Mizumura of being a jingoist, an e […]
  • Another View: Tracing the Foreign in Literary Translation by Eduard Stoklosinski March 14, 2015
    Another View demonstrates exciting potential in translation study and praxis. It is especially significant in deconstructing assumptions about fluency and linguistic identity. The author makes some persuasive arguments for considering and even preferring non-native translation of texts, the most controversial of which is the possibility that linguistic compe […]
  • The Latest Five from Dalkey Archive’s “Library of Korea” Series March 14, 2015
    Despite South Korea having the kind of vibrant literary scene you'd expect from a country with one of the highest literacy rates in the world, we're still not exactly inundated with English translations of South Korean fiction. Given this dearth, Dalkey Archive Press's Library of Korean Literature series, twenty five titles published in collab […]
  • B & Me: A True Story of Literary Arousal by J.C. Hallman March 14, 2015
    here’s a conspicuous history of books that simply should not work: Books like U & I by Nicholson Baker, a book-length exercise in “memory criticism,” where Baker traces Updike’s influence on his own writing life while studiously not actually re-reading any of Updike’s books. Or books like Out of Sheer Rage, Geoff Dyer’s book that procrastinates away from […]
  • The Valerie Miles Interview March 14, 2015
    The idea was to uncover the secret life of these texts, why do their creators consider them their best work? What’s the clandestine, the underground, the surreptitious meaning or attachment? Where’s the kernel, the seed from which a body of work grew, what the driving obsession? Is it something sentimental, something technical, maybe even something spiritual […]
  • On Being Blue by William H. Gass March 14, 2015
    Look up at the sky, or down into the ocean, and what color do you see? We see blue, but not Homer—he never once employs the term throughout The Iliad and The Odyssey, famously calling the sea "wine-dark" and the heavens "bronze." Neither did the Greek philosopher Xenophanes say blue—he described the rainbow as having only three colors. Th […]

The Debate Just Got Stupid

We’ve been having a nice little conversation about the role of negative reviews in literary culture, thanks to Jacob Silverman’s piece in Slate. Alas, now Laura Miller has joined in.

After arguing that we now live in a world where even incredibly successful novelists like Jonathan Franzen are relatively obscure (since so few people care about serious fiction), Miller attempts to build a case for reviews as something that help educated readers decide what to read. Then she writes:

But a negative or middling review of a literary novel that the reader would otherwise have never heard of and is unlikely to ever hear of again? No one needs to read such a thing, and furthermore, no one really wants to. (At Salon, we’ve got the numbers to prove that.) The idea that more negative reviews of such books — what Silverman calls “skeptical, cranky criticisms that may be painful for writers to experience” — will somehow benefit readers in general and “make for a vibrant, useful literary culture” strikes me as misguided. If the point is to educate the author’s fellow writers, then for God’s sake, take it to the classroom, workshop or specialty publication.

Two points here: first, Miller can’t have it both ways. If we do live in a world where only writers and highly educated readers know who James Wood is (as Miller claims), then, yes, these kinds of negative reviews are most definitely a benefit to readers and are a fit mode of communication with the writers who are surely reading them.

And secondly, she entirely ignores the fact that would-be critics like herself have become wholly owned subsidiaries of commercial New York publishing. Some honest, intelligent critiques of the fashionable authors of the moment would go a long way toward diminishing that opinion and restoring lost credibility. Unfortunately, I doubt Miller realizes how much people like herself and venues like Salon have lost status among people who actually care about books.

And well, three points: the argument isn’t for educating one’s fellow writers or for dissing the boutique writers. The argument is for having some standards when it comes to praising books. Silverman’s article was, at heart, a request that people who didn’t know what the hell they were talking about—or who were too quick to follow the crowd toward the next great thing—spend a little more time thinking whether a book really deserved the praise they were about to lavish on it.

Then there’s this, which is simply completely wrong:

Unless such a review is a spiteful slapdown engineered to gratify the unexamined resentments of the worst sort of reader, how welcome (let alone “useful”) can it really be? The kind of criticism that Garner respects, that “means talking about ideas, aesthetics and morality as if these things matter” is not especially illuminating to someone whose only knowledge of the work comes from the review itself. A close critical reading of a text can be revelatory indeed — but only when you’ve had a chance to read it, or other works by the same author, for yourself. “

So much of our literary tradition’s great criticism contradicts this statement that I must conclude that Miller is ignorant of the great critical works. Either that, or she read them and absorbed very little.

You Might Also Like:

More from Conversational Reading:

  1. It's the Books, Stupid I'm not quite as down on electronic reading devices as some, but this was still a welcome reminder. . . . continue reading, and add...
  2. Problems with Reviews Today I’m not too bothered about the backscratching, logrolling, etc that goes on in reviewing. If people are skeptical enough when they see a novelist on...
  3. 96 Percent Stupid Dalkey is getting some great coverage for their Gaddis re-releases. The New Yorker picks out a gem anecdote: William Gaddis, in the closing pages of...
  4. Brewing Richard Powers Debate I haven’t read The Echo Maker yet, so I can’t comment, but two bloggers have some words for William Deresiewicz after he slams The Echo...
  5. Stupid Praise Mark Lotto, i.e. the voice of sanity. Book reviewers, on the other hand, have had no trouble making up their minds about Indecision. The Gray...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

11 comments to The Debate Just Got Stupid

  • Iain

    For what it’s worth, here is the Canadian equivalent of this debate (it pre-dates more recent discussion, but received a parallel revival around the time of the Slate essay this summer). Jan Zwicky opened the doors for discussion some years ago: http://cwila.com/wordpress/an-essay-on-female-reviewing/ (Originally published in The Malahat Review No. 144, Fall 2003)

    The debate was given new life this past July: http://arts.nationalpost.com/2012/07/05/michael-lista-five-thoughts-on-jan-zwickys-response/ with this response.

  • Jack

    The headline alone made my day.

    Here’s a new well-written takedown; I imagine you’ve seen it, but in case not: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/books/review/inside-and-signs-and-wonders-by-alix-ohlin.html?pagewanted=all

  • Sawn

    I think a good example of a negative review is found in this week’s Ron Charles’ review at the Washington Post. Now, he probably isn’t someone Scott Esposito respects, as he usually just covers the latest mass market, semi-literary stuff – but he isn’t afraid to let a book he didn’t like have it. This week he rips up Jonathan Tropper’s newest, but at the same time offers something as an alternative that hasn’t been as Amazon hyped (Amahyped?). Thanks to Charles’ review last summer I picked up a book I thoroughly loved, but hadn’t heard about anywhere else – William Giraldi’s Busy Monsters.

  • admin

    I actually think Ron Charles is a great critic. He was one of the very few people to be honest about Freedom.

  • Sawn

    My apologies,I shouldn’t have made eird thatan assumption. I think it is freakishly weird that the review mentioned above of the Alix Ohlin books was by William Giraldi who I mentioned in my post. Total coincidence as I hadn’t read those comments when I made mine.
    In June Ohlin got an over the top review in Toronto’s The Globe and Mail, which I found quite curious at the time, maybe she fucked the guy?:
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/books-and-media/book-reviews/alix-ohlin-a-writer-who-should-be-famous/article4267001/

    • K

      Seriously? The only reason two reviewers might have different opinions about an author is if one of those critics was fucked by said author? I’ma call bullshit on that right now.

      • Sawn

        Yes, my comment was too men and sarcastic – especially since the individuals are probably not as well known outside of Canada. Alix Ohlin is the daughter of Peter Ohlin who taught at McGill and is a friend of T.F. Rigelhof who taught at Dawson (in Montreal)and who wrote the review in the Globe and Mail.

  • Laura Miller’s idea that a critical piece should be “welcome” or “useful” to be valid is pretty digusting. Why should the author’s opinion of the piece matter at all? I can’t understand why she puts that forth as a major argument against writing negative reviews.

    It’s a slight stretch, but it reminds me of helicopter parents and their incessant efforts to ensure their children remain shielded from negativity or consequences. How is this possibly helpful in the longer term? Do authors somehow write better when their egos are padded by facile reviews?

  • Jim

    Another important function of negative criticism is that, when done well, it provides an instructive model for how to read critically. Critics can help us to read better books, but they can also help us to read better, period. Sophisticated literacy involves questioning how the book that you’re reading succeeds or fails, and criticism provides a basis and provocation for such questioning. I can only assume that the folks who advocate against publishing negative criticism have a far less ambitious understanding of their discipline.

  • Sawn knows something about me I don’t know about myself. It’s probable that sometime in the past 30 some years somewhere on the island of Montreal at some public event or other I was introduced to Peter Ohlin but I honestly don’t remember where or when. We’ve never spoken on the phone or e-mailed. The review of Alex Ohlin’s book is the first time I’ve ever mentioned his name in print. The debate gets really stupid when people start inventing non-existent relationships.

  • [...] it ends up being widely circulated. And her response prompted a particularly abrasive response from Scott Esposito (though I might add that the terms of which the debate is framed was always-already stupid). Then [...]

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>