I don’t see the point in starting a review with a sentence like this one written by Kyle Minor for Salon:
Eula Biss’ “Notes From No Man’s Land” is the most accomplished book of essays anyone has written or published so far in the 21st century.
Yes, I get it, you really like the book, and you want to find some way of communicating your enthusiasm. That’s fine. But “written or published”? Isn’t that taking things a little too far? So somehow you’re not only able to account for every book of essays that has been published in the last 13 years but also every unpublished manuscript sitting out there?
Again, I get that there’s a lot of enthusiasm for this book, and Minor actually does a good job of making the book sound compelling in the rest of the review, but there are much more defensible ways of saying this.