The End of Oulipo?

The End of Oulipo? My book (co-authored with Lauren Elkin), published by Zero Books. Available everywhere. Order it from Amazon, or find it in bookstores nationwide. The End of Oulipo

Lady Chatterley’s Brother

Lady Chatterley's Brother. The first ebook in the new TQC Long Essays series, Lady Chatterley's Brothercalled “an exciting new project” by Chad Post of Open Letter and Three Percent. Why can't Nicholson Baker write about sex? And why can Javier Marias? We investigate why porn is a dead end, and why seduction paves the way for the sex writing of the future. Read an excerpt.

Available now from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and direct from this site:


Translate This Book!

Ever wonder what English is missing? Called "a fascinating Life Perecread" by The New Yorker, Translate This Book! brings together over 40 of the top translators, publishers, and authors to tell us what books need to be published in English. Get it on Kindle.

For low prices on Las Vegas shows visit LasVegas.ShowTickets.com
  • 20 Books at 3820 Books at 38

    I'm surprised to learn Andres Newman is so young. Also, great overview of his books in English. Andrés Neuman is... »
  • The Future ModianoThe Future Modiano

    The Complete Review has the details of the future Englishing of our most recent Nobel laureate. And also, sales figures. For... »
  • Quarterly Conversationi Issue 38Quarterly Conversationi Issue 38

    Issue 38 right here. or TOC after the jump. Features Readings, Fragments,... »
  • On KafkaOn Kafka

    Rivka Galchen on the new Kafka bio by Reiner Stach. I have come to the conclusion that anyone who thinks about Kafka for... »
  • Me on ModianoMe on Modiano

    My review of Suspended Sentences by Patrick Modiano. The most focused of the book’s three diffuse novellas is... »
  • Elena Ferrante InterviewedElena Ferrante Interviewed

    At the NY TImes. I'm currently reading Book 1. Q. You insist on anonymity and yet are developing a cult following,... »
  • Infinite FictionsInfinite Fictions

    Buy David Winters's book.... »
  • Tarr After the HorseTarr After the Horse

    At BOMB: A couple of months after that, in February 2011, Béla Tarr presented the world premiere of The Turin Horse at... »
  • Bolaño: A BiographyBolaño: A Biography

    This is a pretty fair assessment of Bolaño: A Biography. Denied access to papers in the Bolaño estate, the Argentine... »
  • Literary AdvocatesLiterary Advocates

    Very honored to be among the esteemed list of "Literary Advocates" named by Entropy magazine for 2014. The list of... »

You Say

Group Reads

The Tunnel

Fall Read: The Tunnel by William H. Gass

A group read of the book that either "engenders awe and despair" or "[goads] the reader with obscenity and bigotry," or both. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Naked Singularity

Summer Read: A Naked Singularity by Sergio De La Pava

Fans of Gaddis, Pynchon, DeLillo: A group read of the book that went from Xlibris to the University of Chicago Press. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Life Perec

Life A User's Manual by Georges Perec

Starting March 2011, read the greatest novel from an experimental master. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Last Samurai

Fall Read: The Last Samurai by Helen DeWitt

A group read of one of the '00s most-lauded postmodern novels. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Tale of Genji

The Summer of Genji

Two great online lit magazines team up to read a mammoth court drama, the world's first novel.

Your Face Tomorrow

Your Face This Spring

A 3-month read of Javier Marias' mammoth book Your Face Tomorrow

Shop though these links = Support this site


Ten Memorable Quotes from William Gaddis’ Letters

New Books
Here are ten of my favorite moments from these hugely interesting letters.


Interviews from Conversational Reading

New Books
See this page for interviews with leading authors, translators, publishers, and more.


  • [[there.]] by Lance Olsen December 15, 2014
    Lance Olsen is the author of two recent works, [[there.]] and Theories of Forgetting (FC2). The second presents three narratives in a clearly fictional mode while the first offers day-to-day thoughts on living in another country. We rightly suspect that any artist’s memoir or diary ought to be viewed as written with a prospective public in mind, no matter ho […]
  • Noir and Nihilism in True Detective December 15, 2014
    "It’s just one story. The oldest. . . . Light versus dark." Spanning 8 episodes between January and March of 2014, HBO’s runaway hit True Detective challenged the status quo of contemporary crime drama. The show has been widely celebrated for its philosophy, complexity, and visual aesthetic. Co-starring actors Matthew McConaughey as Rustin "Ru […]
  • The Colonel’s World December 15, 2014
    Mahmoud Dowlatabadi (born 1940) is considered by many the living Iranian novelist, a perennial Nobel Prize candidate. Dowlatabadi wrote The Colonel some thirty years ago, because in his own words he had been “afflicted.” The subject forced him to sit at the desk and write nonstop for two years. “Writing The Colonel I felt a strong sense of indignation and pa […]
  • Mr Gwyn and Three Times at Dawn by Alessandro Baricco December 15, 2014
    Alessandro Baricco’s well-crafted, elegant prose seems as though it should create the impression of distance, or of abstraction; instead, the reader of Mr. Gwyn and Three Times at Dawn becomes wholly implicated and immersed, drawn into a dreamy and idiosyncratic world that blurs the division between reader, character and writer. As readers, we expect that th […]
  • The Walls of Delhi by Uday Prakash December 15, 2014
    "The paan shop leads to the opening of a tunnel, full of the creatures of the city, and the tears and spit of a fakir." In a single opening line, Uday Prakash sets the scene for the politically incisive, yet intimately human stories of The Walls of Delhi (translated brilliantly from the Hindi by Jason Grunebaum). Lest the fakir suggest otherwise, t […]
  • The Man Between: Michael Henry Heim and a Life in Translation December 15, 2014
    In a speech reprinted in the book, Heim makes a self-deprecating joke about whether the life of a translator is worth reading: “What does a translator do? He sits and translates!” The Man Between serves as a book-length retort by laying bare all the things Heim did: these include persuading the academy that translation is a scholarly (in addition to a creati […]
  • The Prabda Yoon Interview December 15, 2014
    Yes, I think people are not comfortable anymore to write in this straightforward, traditional way, especially the younger, more progressive writers. So it’s interesting—you have social commentary, and you also get a little bit of structural experiment. You have themes that are very, very Thai. I’m actually very interested to see what new writers will come up […]
  • The End of Days by Jenny Erpenbeck December 15, 2014
    For Jenny Erpenbeck, no life is lived in an indisputable straight line. Which is why, in her new novel (new in English, though published in 2012 as Aller Tage Abend) she approaches the narrative as a series of potential emotional earthquakes, some which take place, some which might have taken place, all of which reveal something of how political turbulence p […]
  • In the Heart of the Heart of the Country by William H. Gass December 15, 2014
    Once, at a writers symposium, William Howard Gass remarked that to substitute the page for the world is a form of revenge for the recognition that "you are, in terms of the so-called world, an impotent nobody." There is inarguably no contemporary writer of American stock in whose work one might locate a more ambitious war of attrition between innov […]
  • Faces in the Crowd by Valeria Luiselli December 15, 2014
    Luiselli’s first novel, Faces in the Crowd, translated into fluid English by Christina MacSweeney, is the perfect illustration of this attitude toward fiction writing. Narrated in short sections spanning multiple storylines and the better part of one hundred years, it uses "[d]eep excavations" to expose the empty spaces in two lives, those of a you […]

The Reading Crisis

n + 1 has an article up about "The Reading Crisis." (Link goes to the n + 1 main page since they don’t seem to have a permalink to the article.) I like n + 1, but I think I need a little more from them than this. Basically, the article (I guess it’s written by "The Editors") is bemoaning the fact that our so-called reading crisis now makes it excusable for authors to hawk their books in all manner of creative (sometimes demeaning) ways.

A real debate could be had about all these things. Instead we get the “reading crisis.” Under conditions of the reading crisis, everything a writer does, no matter how self-serving and reprehensible, becomes a blow in the service of literature. An arbiter of a “revolution” in reading features games, accordionists, and contests at his public events. A best-selling author sends out emails asking acquaintances to buy his new book before it slips off the Times top-seller list—because without these sales-markers, classic works can disappear. A blogger-author roams bookstores putting advertisements in books reminiscent of her own: “If you liked this, you’ll love The Tattle-Tale.” And these figures are held up as models of the hopeful signs for a renaissance in reading.

Well, okay, I guess it’s fair to complain about this, but I don’t see The Editors offering any solutions. What should authors do? Just manfully abide like good stoics and hope their books sell?

And also, author self-whoring isn’t exactly new. I don’t think you can ascribe it tall o a changed climate brought on by a decline in general reading. No, no, the industry has been moving toward this for some time now.

Blame the industry, the authors, or just plain old crass commercialism, but sales-generating acrobatics on the part of authors are now expected by publishers. Not to mention that many authors, after they discover that their publishers will give their book virtually no attention, instead lavishing hundreds of thousands on a few lead titles, practically beg for the chance to whore themselves out.

I guess my point is you can blame authors for doing this if you what, but what the hell else are they supposed to do? And do we really need a whole editorial lambasting authors for bowing to market forces? Not to mention, didn’t Benjamin Kunkel just do a huge PR blitz for his book? Oh, but articles in the Times and The New Yorker are part of the dignified approach to bookselling. The good old genteel tradition of back slapping and goodoldboy networks.

I’ve got nothing again people who want to critize the sorts of things authors are forced to do to sell their books. I agree, it’s screwed up. But let’s try to realize that it’s not completely the author’s fault. And if you think this is a bad state of affairs, then how about telling us what should be done about it?

You Might Also Like:

More from Conversational Reading:

  1. Long Tails Dan Green points to an article that tells us: "The average Barnes & Noble carries 130,000 titles. Yet more than half of Amazon’s book sales...
  2. Decline of reading in America Someone go call Kevin Smokler and ask him what he makes of this. Faced with declining sales, two of the biggest publishers of mass-market titles,...
  3. People Don't Read Borges? Jorge Luis Borges went from being an unknown middle-aged librarian to one of the 20th century’s most influential writers. So why do so few people...
  4. Listening ≠ Reading This is discouraging: Jim Harris, a lifelong bookworm, cracked the covers of only four books last year. But he listened to 54, all unabridged. ....
  5. A Sad Story of a First-Time Author This story, from the Columbia Journalism Review’s first annual books issue, is making the roundsof the lit blogs. It’s a pretty interesting read about how...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

14 comments to The Reading Crisis

  • ed

    Looks like we’re smoking the same ganja. :)

  • I’d have more respect for Kunkel without all the doe-eyed come-do-me publicity photos that seem to accompany media pieces on/by him.

  • Dickens and Twain did whatever they could do to publicize their works why should today’s authors be castigated for doing the same thing.

  • I’m not sure how a reading crisis and writers marketing themselves are related. How else do we get hear about new books? New writers? Writers have to compete in a marketplace where everything else is vying for attention. And it certainly seems better than having a patron who might dictate what you can or cannot publish.

  • And honestly, doesn’t the pull-out-all-stops marketing methods apply to everything sold these days? As long as I’m not getting spammed by authors (I am by bankers, mortgage companies, petroleum and drug companies)which these days is about the lowest you can go, I say more power to ‘em.

  • WHY WE LOVE TLS (UPDATED)

    We’re still technically on vacation so, really, nothing to see here. But this caught our eye and was too entertaining not to share. Since it isn’t available online, we painstakingly retype TLS’ marvelous NB column from the most recent issue:Norman

  • WHY WE LOVE TLS (UPDATED)

    We’re still technically on vacation so, really, nothing to see here. But this caught our eye and was too entertaining not to share. Since it isn’t available online, we painstakingly retype TLS’ marvelous NB column from the most recent issue:Norman

  • WHY WE LOVE TLS (UPDATED)

    We’re still technically on vacation so, really, nothing to see here. But this caught our eye and was too entertaining not to share. Since it isn’t available online, we painstakingly retype TLS’ marvelous NB column from the most recent issue:Norman

  • And if you think this is a bad state of affairs, then how about telling us what should be done about it?
    Once again, one can only refer the author of these remarks to the journal itself, specifically issue #2. There seems this odd sort of delay at work, wherein the blogly critics of this magazine’s third issue have suddenly decided to raise questions already dealt with in the second. Not that there isn’t more than ample substance in #3 of course…
    In the meantime, why stand in the way of a good thing? (Less importantly, why lend credence to impressivly deranged, bizarre chip-on-the-shoulder readings elsewhere?)
    Really, why? Is it jealousy? Must the Blogs be continuously fed and appeased? Speaking more abstractly, of course.
    Though, to be unecessarily blunt, perhaps you could stand to think a bit more critically here, about the place you may occupy–about the ways you (or rather litblogs in general) cannot fail to be implicated in the context of their actual critiques.
    And by “critiques” I mean the ones in the actual magazine, and in print. In issue #2, in this case.

  • Matt,
    Stop yourself. You’re really not doing yourself any good with these remarks.
    I’m all for intelligent comments, but this isn’t it. So you’re saying that I can’t criticize a poorly argued editorial because there was a previous article in a prior issue of n + 1 that dealt with the same topic? Matt . . . try making some fucking sense.
    Obviously you’re a real big fan of n + 1. Good for you. Why don’t you take the time you’re wasting here and put it into a nice big fan letter. Maybe if you’re really good about it Kunkel himself will come over and let you . . .

  • Very classy Scott…
    The advice on “what is good for me” is certainly appreciated, but there’s something I forgot to say:
    It occurs to me that if by some chance you actually do read the magazine (you now say you’ve read from it–that wouldn’t be just the online material by any chance now would it?)…and assuming you aren’t just trying to suck up to some other litblogger or other…then, sadly enough, these two posts are just plain philistine.
    How? Well if I must begin to spell it out:
    By failing to recognize how this article, in its serious tone, is entirely of a piece with that ongoing critique of ‘Eggers’ you now say you’ve read. Indeed, by failing to recognize how you yourself repeat the ‘Eggers’ mentality by so latching onto Kunkel as a stand-in for n+1 in general, as a cheap hook by which to attack something truly excellent and fragile.
    I didn’t want to think that was the case, but now it seems entirely more likely.
    Oh, and I should try making some fucking sense? Should I try finding a cheap angle to get my Eggers-like gossipy bit of facile take-down litblog fame?
    Look, this is a fantastic, highly original, highly intelligent magazine. Don’t take my word for it; subscribe. (They could abandon some of the more cutesy online stuff, sure.) There are good and complex claims worth criticizing and engaging with in that article; I don’t see it here.
    Not that it’s germane in the slightest to even mention, but I’m no huge fan of Kunkel. His writing by itself is by no means representative of n+1, in any case. I’ll simply repeat the question: why use philistine attacks on him as grounds to take gratuitous swipes at a fragile thing? (And why lend credence to others less careful and even more philistine?)
    If, on the other hand, you are sincere in your questions about the article, then you should be delighted to hear that they have already been substantially addressed in previous issues, am I wrong?
    The offer to share my copy still stands.

  • To be fair, that bit you cite from the article is also a bit of a cheap shot at blogger-authors.
    These divisions needn’t prove decisive, however. The fact that some bloggers seem inclined to up the ante of snark rather than self-critically reflect doesn’t exactly help, of course.
    Do you disagree that most blog-books are over-hyped crap, Scott? The article isn’t ruling out the possibility of something good; merely describing the climate we are in. The work of description is of course hardly important; on the contrary.

  • All right. Now you are making some sense. Thank you.
    “Read from the magazine” = I buy them and hold them in my pretty little hands, but I don’t read them cover to cover.
    I didn’t take the “Reading Crisis” article as part of their ongoing takedown of Eggers. Really, I thought that was satisfactorily accomplished in Issue 1.
    I likened Kunkel to Eggers because they are both the most highly publicized members of their respective journals/cliques. I imagine that n + 1′s ongoing takedown of Eggers has more than a little to do with Kunkel’s interest in being the new Eggers. As such, it think it’s fair to use Kunkel to stand in for n + 1 just as most of us use Eggers to stand in for McSweeney’s.
    Bottom line: Like anything else on this blog, n + 1 is not sacred. I’ve praised n + 1 and I’ve criticized it. I’m not trying to take it down any more than you are. I couldn’t. I thought it was a poor editorial, so I said so. I don’t really think, at this point, we need anyone to point out that authors are going to extreme efforts to get their readers. Beyond that, we disagree over whether it’s good or bad: I think it’s ok and somewhat forced on the authors, they think otherwise. We’re diagreeing. No one is taking down anyone.

  • As such, it think it’s fair to use Kunkel to stand in for n + 1 just as most of us use Eggers to stand in for McSweeney’s.
    Except of course that n+1 (the magazine, not Kunkel’s book) has four outstanding editors, while McSweeney’s has one shitty one.
    Ok, I’m done fawning now. Glad to hear you aren’t at all interested in facile take-downs. Surely it reflects better on us generally, to actively distance ourselves from those.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>