Lady Chatterley’s Brother Lady Chatterley's Brother. The first ebook in the new TQC Long Essays series,  called “an exciting new project” by Chad Post of Open Letter and Three Percent. Why can't Nicholson Baker write about sex? And why can Javier Marias? We investigate why porn is a dead end, and why seduction paves the way for the sex writing of the future. Read an excerpt.
Available now from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and direct from this site:
Translate This Book! Ever wonder what English is missing? Called "a fascinating  read" by The New Yorker, Translate This Book! brings together over 40 of the top translators, publishers, and authors to tell us what books need to be published in English. Get it on Kindle.
|
Shop though these links = Support this site
Interviews from Conversational Reading  See this page for interviews with leading authors, translators, publishers, and more.
|
Ulysses: The Ultimate Niche Text
Not sure I'd agree, but some interesting points are raised here:
Nearly ninety years later, Joyce has certainly cemented his reputation, but with a decidedly more narrow audience than he sought. It seems that only in the academy does anyone bother with what Joyce meant, his work routinely distilled through faddish literary trends: semiotics, deconstruction, post-colonialism. He has achieved tenure, not immortality.
The reading public, or what remains of it, cares little for the middle-aged Jew (Leopold Bloom) and distraught young poet (Stephen Dedalus) who are the protagonists of Joyce’s messy masterpiece. The heroes of our time are Harvard “symbologists” and Hogwarts wizards. A complex epic that employs a maddeningly non-linear plot, multiple languages and allusions to pretty much the entire Western literary tradition just isn’t suited to our tastes.
I haven't read Ulysses , but I know enough about Joyce and the circumstances of the book's creation to highly doubt that Joyce's famous quote about ensuring immortality through enigmatic references was to be taken unironically. In any event, there's nothing stopping the common reader from ignoring all that and just enjoying the text if that's what she wants to do; Ulysses has survived because it's first and foremost a good read, hasn't it?
The rest of the article is pretty good, though. It's about a book called Ulysses and Us: The Art of Everyday Life in Joyce's Masterpiece , which is likened to "a reclamation project" on behalf of the everyday reader. Again, not sure how I feel about that, though the book sounds like it's fairly in-depth and gets beyond what "reclamation project" would imply.
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading: - Artist’s Books I don’t have much use for illustrations in a novel (unless, perhaps, it’s W.G. Sebald’s novel), but this, apparently, has a long history. When Joyce...
- Literary Events Wiki Carrie Olivia Adams has put together a wiki where anyone can add information as to literary events in their area. It's broken down by state...
- JCO Here’s your Joyce Carol Oates of translation. ...
- Thirwell on Wright/Queneau Adam Thirwell's homage to the amazing translator Barbara Wright is worth reading. Here's a bit: It begins with a digression in Paris. In 1929, Samuel...
- Epic Poem Alan Kaufman on the newest work by San Francisco’s poet laureate. 1,000 pages and comparisons to Whitman and Joyce. Recently issued by an Italian publisher...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Leave a Reply
|
Recommended Books DeLillo's major work before White Noise is probably his most underrated novel. Its all right here--the politics of paranoia, terrorism, the unnamable--set in an evocative, timeless Greece.
The most bizarre Abe novel I've yet read, which is indeed saying something. About a subclass of Japanese men who go around wearing boxes from the waist up (and then use them as domiciles in the evening), the book is also an experiment in perspective shifts, a highly unstable, metafictional first-person narrative, and an exploration of voyeurism, consumerism, and aberrant sexuality.
Charting the path to three gunshots--the one that killed filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, the one that disabled his Islamic extremist assassin, Mohammed Bouyeri, and the one that led to Vincent Van Gogh’s one hundred years earlier--Olsen tells three separate stories that resonate with one another on numerous levels: the logic of extremism, the role of the dissident in Dutch society, the limits of tolerance, the purpose of the artist, the feeling of the most important five minutes of your life. Read my interview with the author.
Creatively structured, well-executed epic novel of rural South Africa from 1950 - 2000. Takes on a lot and lives up to it magnificently. Highly recommended.
A book that's an interview about the book you're supposedly holding in your hands. Creative, potent, and full of life. Just what metafiction should be. Read my post on it.
|
Biblioklept on Patience (After Sebald)
Stealing from Conversational Reading
The Names by Don DeLillo (1982)
The Box Man by Kobo Abe (1973, English 1974)
Head in Flames by Lance Olsen (2009)
Agaat by Marlene van Niekerk (2006, English 2010)
The Weather Fifteen Years Ago by Wolf Haas (2006, English 2009)
Yes, Ulysses is very funny and very beautiful, and those are big reasons for the book’s persistence. There have been plenty of simply arcane tomes we have completely and rightfully forgotten.
“Ulysses has survived because it’s first and foremost a good read, hasn’t it?”
This is putting it a little strongly. It is a bewilderingly fortifying read. If you care about possibility in fiction, you have to read it, because it does practically everything fiction has ever tried to do. But the motivation to keep plowing through it, to get to the humane and earthy fun parts, has to come from somewhere, and if it’s not academic motivation we’re talking about, it’s got to be that you’re a reader or writer who is deeply concerned with what fiction can do. So maybe even a smaller niche than the academy.
The article compares apples and oranges doesn’t it? It’s like saying Ulysses is nothing like a the modern romance novel. Comparisons should be drawn to serious fiction.
I would bet in 75 years more people will know the name James Joyce than Dan Brown or J.K Rowling.
The fact that the piece is even comparing best-sellers that came out in the past few years to a dense and complex book about a day in Dublin written almost a century ago should tell us all we need to know about Joyce’s endurance.
The piece compares those apples and oranges in terms of what’s popularly believed about current reader appetites, but the next paragraph, in introducing the book under review, rebuts the point — or at least offers a possible rebuttal to the point.
“I haven’t read Ulysses…”
I think you kind of proved their point by starting your commentary with that.
One of the things I’m proud of is having read Ulysses. But I couldn’t have done it without a lot of help (Ulysses Annotated: Notes for James Joyce’s Ulysses) and a lot of uninterrupted time (a 2 week vacation). I find it gets better the farther I get away from it. And I would like to say I’ve dipped back in from time to time, but, alas, I’ve not. I feel it was a rich, fascinating, confusing, and tremendously stimulating experience. And that’s what I want from a read. I don’t really want to get into comparisons with other works – what’s the use. If something is considered a great work of art, then I’d like to find a way through it. That’s one reason I’ve abandoned book clubs – I want to read what I want to read. Although sometimes I want to discuss with others. Oh well.