I’d suggest that what J R documents is the way that America is hollowing out the foundation necessary to even read a book like it, an America that teaches its children via closed-circuit television, an America that thinks democracy means owning a share of profit-maximizing publicly traded corporations. This is what it means to say that J R is about the conditions underlying the impossibility of its own reception. If there were a welcoming mass public for books like this, a public able to appreciate its beautiful difficulty and astonishing imagination, we wouldn’t live in the sort of world so in need of savage satirical critique in the first place.
Although I would disagree with Lee that “Unlike Pynchon — who is more concerned in his classic postmodern novels with how entropy operates in thermodynamics and information theory — Gaddis means entropy to be a metaphor for the din of American life and the ‘free enterprise’ system.” I think Pynchon’s take on entropy has very much to do with critiquing the American system.
Also see William Gaddis, the Last Protestant by John Lingan at The Quarterly Conversation.
You Might Also Like:
More from Conversational Reading:
- Hemingway Documents Redux The Guardian provides some English-language coverage of the Hemingway/Cuba story I blogged about earlier this week. Cuba’s has begun allowing electronic access to more than...
- Cuban Hemingway Documents Digitized El Pais reports that though the U.S. and Cuba can’t come together on most issues, they can agree to join forces in digitizing Papa’s private...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.