The End of Oulipo?

The End of Oulipo? My book (co-authored with Lauren Elkin), published by Zero Books. Available everywhere. Order it from Amazon, or find it in bookstores nationwide. The End of Oulipo

Lady Chatterley’s Brother

Lady Chatterley's Brother. The first ebook in the new TQC Long Essays series, Lady Chatterley's Brothercalled “an exciting new project” by Chad Post of Open Letter and Three Percent. Why can't Nicholson Baker write about sex? And why can Javier Marias? We investigate why porn is a dead end, and why seduction paves the way for the sex writing of the future. Read an excerpt.

Available now from Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and direct from this site:


Translate This Book!

Ever wonder what English is missing? Called "a fascinating Life Perecread" by The New Yorker, Translate This Book! brings together over 40 of the top translators, publishers, and authors to tell us what books need to be published in English. Get it on Kindle.

For low prices on Las Vegas shows visit LasVegas.ShowTickets.com

You Say

Group Reads

The Tunnel

Fall Read: The Tunnel by William H. Gass

A group read of the book that either "engenders awe and despair" or "[goads] the reader with obscenity and bigotry," or both. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Naked Singularity

Summer Read: A Naked Singularity by Sergio De La Pava

Fans of Gaddis, Pynchon, DeLillo: A group read of the book that went from Xlibris to the University of Chicago Press. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Life Perec

Life A User's Manual by Georges Perec

Starting March 2011, read the greatest novel from an experimental master. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Last Samurai

Fall Read: The Last Samurai by Helen DeWitt

A group read of one of the '00s most-lauded postmodern novels. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Tale of Genji

The Summer of Genji

Two great online lit magazines team up to read a mammoth court drama, the world's first novel.

Your Face Tomorrow

Your Face This Spring

A 3-month read of Javier Marias' mammoth book Your Face Tomorrow

Shop though these links = Support this site


Ten Memorable Quotes from William Gaddis’ Letters

New Books
Here are ten of my favorite moments from these hugely interesting letters.


Interviews from Conversational Reading

New Books
See this page for interviews with leading authors, translators, publishers, and more.


  • A Legacy by Sybille Bedford March 15, 2015
    Sybille Bedford had the benefit—or bad fortune, however you see it—of being born into the German aristocracy in 1911. Her father was a retired lieutenant colonel and art collector from the agrarian south, from a Roman Catholic family in fiscal decline. Her mother came from a wealthy German-Jewish family from Hamburg. A widower from his first marriage, Bedfor […]
  • Reviving Antal Szerb March 15, 2015
    Antal Szerb’s lithe, lively, and wholly endearing fiction is peopled by male dreamers on spiritual journeys of self-discovery. Each one sets out on his respective mini-mission with good intentions but knows from the outset that there are only so many harsh truths he can withstand. In this respect, all Szerb’s protagonists seem to have heeded the advice of Gr […]
  • 39 Africans Walk into a Bar March 15, 2015
    New anthologies of African fiction seem to materialize virtually every year, if not more often in recent years. When presented with the physical fact of yet another new anthology of African fiction, the immediate question, one which I was asked when I pressed the warm, bound pages of the Africa39 anthology into the even warmer hands of a new acquaintance, wa […]
  • The Country Road by Regina Ullmann March 15, 2015
    This collection of short stories, her first to appear in English, counters material poverty with a fulfilling and deeply spiritual relationship with the natural world. Ullmann herself was no stranger to hardship. A depressive, she was plagued by personal and professional crises. Financial constraints forced her to send her illegitimate children to the countr […]
  • The Fall of Language in the Age of English by Minae Mizumura March 14, 2015
    The Fall of Language in the Age of English stirred up debate upon its publication in Japan in 2008, and it’s possible it will do so in the U.S. with its arrival in Mari Yoshihara and Juliet Winters Carpenter's translation. In their introduction, Yoshihara and Winters Carpenter, point out that Japanese reviewers accused Mizumura of being a jingoist, an e […]
  • Another View: Tracing the Foreign in Literary Translation by Eduard Stoklosinski March 14, 2015
    Another View demonstrates exciting potential in translation study and praxis. It is especially significant in deconstructing assumptions about fluency and linguistic identity. The author makes some persuasive arguments for considering and even preferring non-native translation of texts, the most controversial of which is the possibility that linguistic compe […]
  • The Latest Five from Dalkey Archive’s “Library of Korea” Series March 14, 2015
    Despite South Korea having the kind of vibrant literary scene you'd expect from a country with one of the highest literacy rates in the world, we're still not exactly inundated with English translations of South Korean fiction. Given this dearth, Dalkey Archive Press's Library of Korean Literature series, twenty five titles published in collab […]
  • B & Me: A True Story of Literary Arousal by J.C. Hallman March 14, 2015
    here’s a conspicuous history of books that simply should not work: Books like U & I by Nicholson Baker, a book-length exercise in “memory criticism,” where Baker traces Updike’s influence on his own writing life while studiously not actually re-reading any of Updike’s books. Or books like Out of Sheer Rage, Geoff Dyer’s book that procrastinates away from […]
  • The Valerie Miles Interview March 14, 2015
    The idea was to uncover the secret life of these texts, why do their creators consider them their best work? What’s the clandestine, the underground, the surreptitious meaning or attachment? Where’s the kernel, the seed from which a body of work grew, what the driving obsession? Is it something sentimental, something technical, maybe even something spiritual […]
  • On Being Blue by William H. Gass March 14, 2015
    Look up at the sky, or down into the ocean, and what color do you see? We see blue, but not Homer—he never once employs the term throughout The Iliad and The Odyssey, famously calling the sea "wine-dark" and the heavens "bronze." Neither did the Greek philosopher Xenophanes say blue—he described the rainbow as having only three colors. Th […]

Why the Siege of Krishnapur Stays Stuck in My Mind the Way a Chicken Bone Stays Stuck in My Throat

The voting is done, the tallies are in, and the super/meta/ultimate-Booker–or whatever you call it–has not gone to J.G. Farrell’s novel of imperial decay, The Siege of Krishnapur. (Predictably, some guy with a cleric problem has taken the honor.)

Let us pause momentarily to appreciate the coincidence that an Indian-British novelist’s book about postcolonial India, a book that captures the essence of postmodern play and hystericism, has beat out a British novelist’s book about colonial India, a book that, though published in 1973, looks back to the realist conventions of an earlier style of crafting a novel. And how strange that though Midnight’s Children remains one of Britain’s most popular novels, J.G. Farrell’s The Siege of Krishnapur, as reported in an earlier story on the Booker website, has largely fallen off the map of the British literary landscape.

It’s ridiculous to think that a largely unknown novel could win a popularity contest over a just-knighted titian of British letters, and that means what I’m about to write is a catch-22, but what a favor the British reading public would have done itself had it voted The Siege to win, thereby giving British publishers a good reason to bring this novel back into wide circulation. (In the U.S. we’re fortunate that NYRB has done just that for us.)

I chanced on and read this novel just over three years ago, quickly losing no time in recording my breathless appreciation in this blog. It is a book that, though superficially similar to novels of an earlier era, nonetheless makes subtle use of the irony and historical perspective at the disposal of an author well into the 20th century. In my post I called it E.M. Forster meets Ernest Hemingway, and this gets at what is so satisfying about the book: it twins excellent character studies, abetted by a thorough portrayal of British manners among the upper classes living in the colonies, with a driving narrative that’s every bit as brutal and gripping as Hemingway at his best.

The Siege of Krishnapur details exactly what the title says it will: a British outpost in Krishnapur, India, is laid siege to, and the novel draws out the drama as upper-crust types, generally accustomed to every luxury available in a British colony, are subjected to inexorable bodily degradation and forced to figure out how to defend themselves. Farrell expertly forges the souls of his characters in the smithy of the siege: as you are reading it, you become dreadfully aware that this is the trial that will define the lives of all who leave this siege alive. Farrell is unsparing, but never gratuitous or unfair, in forcing his colonists to let drop all of the routines and rules they cling to as defenses.

Here, for example, is what I wrote about a character named the Collector, and how he tries to force back the reality of what is happening to him:

All the major characters feel spot-on, and Farrell conveys so much
with so little. To-wit, here’s the Collector, the sort of head
bureaucrat during the siege:

Later, while
he was drinking tea at the table in his bedroom with three young
subalterns from Captainganj a succession of musket balls came through
the winder, attracted by the oil-lamp . . . one, two, three and then a
fourth, one after another. The officers dived smartly under the table,
leaving the Collector to drink his tea alone. After a while they
re-emerged smiling sheepishly, deeply impressed by the Collector’s
sang-froid. Realizing that he had forgotten to sweeten his tea, the
Collector dipped a teaspoon into the sugar-bowl. But then he found that
he was unable to keep the sugar on the spoon: as quickly as he scooped
it up, it danced off again. It was clear that he would never get it
from the sugar-bowl to the cup without scattering it over the table, so
in the end he was obliged to push the sugar away and drink his tea
unsweetened.

There’s something that just
gets me about that passage. The Collector resigned to his sugarless
tea, enduring the siege with a straight face, almost bored with the
musket balls except that he can’t keep his body from the fear of
evisceration. He’s trying to be diginified and British, but he’s also
resigned to the fact that he’s not quite pulling it off, but he’s still
trying to create the appearance of it. It’s so the Collector. All of
Farrell’s characters are like this.

Farrell died tragically young, the victim of a freak wave during a fishing expedition. Before his death, however, he did leave us with what is known as the Empire Trilogy, an epic work examining the British empire and of which The Siege of Krishnapur is the middle title. The first, Troubles, and the last, The Singapore Grip, have also been brought back into print in the U.S. by NYRB and are well worth reading.

A piece over at The Guardian blog (which ran before that site lost its groove) captures why Farrell wrote this trilogy, that is, why he would want to consider the British empire from the vantage point of the 1970s; in doing so, the piece also offers compelling evidence why this book should still be read, both as literature and as a novel of ideas:

Farrell said that he wanted to show "yesterday reflected in today’s
consciousness", but by association, of course, he also holds a glass up
to the modern world. His comically detailed descriptions of various
residents’ losses of faith – coupled with their outlandish religious
beliefs and the way they adhere to now discredited theories like
phrenology – forces us into a hard look at the accepted wisdom of the
modern world (say, the immediacy of global warming, or the need to
worship Radiohead). I for one felt a shudder of new uncertainty.

Then, there is colonialism. When the audiobook of the Siege Of
Krishnapur came out in 2005, a writer in the Sunday Times said: "A
novel set in India in 1857, the year of the Mutiny, in which the points
of view of the Indians are almost nonexistent, would be unlikely to win
the Man Booker prize these days." That’s perhaps worthy of a debate in
itself, but it’s the accusation against Farrell that interests me: the
idea that, as the reviewer went on, he was guilty of "cultural
imbalance". I don’t buy this line at all. The fact that Indians (with
the rule-proving exception of a westernised maharajah’s son) are so
peripheral to the action speaks volumes about the attitude of the
British colonialists squirming and struggling under Farrell’s
microscope, not to mention the way colonialism dehumanises and
brutalises the oppressor and the oppressed.

It also provokes an uncomfortable recognition about the way we still
think about our colonial past. It’s the fact that The Siege of
Krishanpur provokes such edgy, unsettling ideas that makes me think it
would be unlikely to triumph in the Booker Prize in "these days" of
safe and stodgy winners, rather than any misdirected political
correctness.

The British are fortunate to have a writer like Rushdie, who, when he’s on his game, can illuminate the realities of the British immigrant experience and capture the feel of life and the questions animating it in one of the postcolonial societies it left behind; but our trans-Atlantic cousins are perhaps letting drop a precious opportunity when they don’t take the opportunity to read Farrell alongside Rushdie. And as to us Americans, as I noted in my earlier post, there are a few lessons to be learned over here from Farrell as well.

Speaking of, reading Farrell’s trilogy on the British empire tends to make me wonder: Who is our Farrell? To be sure, an American writing today isn’t in the same position vis a vis empire as a Brit writing the ’70s, but there is nonetheless a lot of American imperial history to consider. Off the top of my head, I would say that Don DeLillo in Libra and Underworld makes our best stand-in. But perhaps we’ll have found our Farrell when someone updates for the 21st century what probably is America’s best last imperial trilogy: USA by John Dos Passos.

 

More from Conversational Reading:

  1. Friday Hip Hop: Nas — New York State of Mind This right here is the track I always hoped Nas would make another like. Not that he hasn’t made some nicecuts since this one,...
  2. Lifting the veil on a new world power In Spite of the Gods, reviewed in the San Francisco Chronicle. Similarly, countries as vast and complex as India are reduced, by us, to a...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

9 comments to Why the Siege of Krishnapur Stays Stuck in My Mind the Way a Chicken Bone Stays Stuck in My Throat

  • hi there, i don’t know if you realize that you make an unintentional excellent point about the misleading aspect of book’s popularity and beauty contests, that is, a book wonderful book that everyone has forgotten cannot win the beauty contest. such is the nature of most literary awards. there’s a machinery that is set in motion that automatically propels certain books to the top. having said that, one should remember that both Siege and MC come from the same machinery, both being very good books of fiction. but in the modern, hyper-sensitive/political world that’s not enough. just the criticism of empire is not enough; that’s basic knowledge. rushdie’s novel draws attention to so many different aspects of history and story telling that i doubt farrell was even capable of grasping the enormity of the subject. this is not deny its own class and mastery. MC and technique of casting doubt over narratives (not just grand narratives) is perhaps the main reason why Siege would be relegated to forgotten shelves. most western readers (and you may not be one of them :) simply have no leverage to grasp rushdie’s earlier work because of weak understanding of asian/india/islamic history and in this case indian author quickly recognizes that and expresses a preference.
    - moazzam

  • hi there, i don’t know if you realize that you make an unintentional excellent point about the misleading aspect of book’s popularity and beauty contests, that is, a book wonderful book that everyone has forgotten cannot win the beauty contest. such is the nature of most literary awards. there’s a machinery that is set in motion that automatically propels certain books to the top. having said that, one should remember that both Siege and MC come from the same machinery, both being very good books of fiction. but in the modern, hyper-sensitive/political world that’s not enough. just the criticism of empire is not enough; that’s basic knowledge. rushdie’s novel draws attention to so many different aspects of history and story telling that i doubt farrell was even capable of grasping the enormity of the subject. this is not deny its own class and mastery. MC and technique of casting doubt over narratives (not just grand narratives) is perhaps the main reason why Siege would be relegated to forgotten shelves. most western readers (and you may not be one of them :) simply have no leverage to grasp rushdie’s earlier work because of weak understanding of asian/india/islamic history and in this case indian author quickly recognizes that and expresses a preference.
    - moazzam

  • Your prior appreciation of Krishnapur is a fine itemization of its merits; I came upon it by other means, and might add a couple more items:
    http://nnyhav.blogspot.com/2007/03/i-think-it-would-be-very-good-idea.html
    Part of the problem of the book’s getting wider notice is its pitchperfectedness; I’ve known sophisticated readers to mistake it for just another colonial narrative of the sort that doesn’t question (interrogate?) the British perspective.
    When you say our Farrell, it’s not just American writing, it’s introspective positioning against declined empire. We’ll have to await developments on both decline and introspection (meanwhile, consider the number of US emigre narratives compared to Britain).

  • Paul

    If you listen to this short podcast accompanying the interview with Rushdie, interestingly, he speaks about his admiration for The Siege of Krishnapur, says it is his favourite novel out of all the books that have been awarded the Booker prize, and says that if he had not died so tragically young, Farrell would have gone on to be one of the greatest English language novelists of his generation.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/audio/2008/jul/10/jeffries.rushdie

  • that’s mohammad ali syndrome – he’d beat his opponent to pulp and than say something very nice, like the bloke is the best fighter he’s fought so far and so on. also, if one were to keep rushdie’s fauz pas with regards to the infamous intro. he wrote for his mirrowork, many south asians know that despite rushdie’s genius one simply cannot always trust his pontifications. he often behaves the way champs do. all of this is not meant to take anything away from Farrell’s talent. there certainly some novels, which when judged on a different set of criteria, may turn out to better pieces of art (when time judges them with a distance of time), but we are dealing with two separate issues here: a) the nature of popularity contest as it has been refined in the capitalist west and b) the tone and tenor, command and graps of multiple historical intersecting narratives, which is simply beyond any western writer, unless that writer, in turn, has assimilated the experience of colonization at least, carries an insider’s experience of islamic/indian culture and history. most serious readers of MC admit the rawness of the novel and that becomes the novel’s strength because it ushers a whole new needle into the western cannon. and it is there where Farrell or anybody else may have an impossible task to tackle.
    thanks,
    moazzam

  • correction: it is faux pas, not fauz pas, although i like the sound of it better.
    - moazzam

  • Paul

    I always get wary when the word ‘genius’ is bandied around about a writer. I don’t think Rushdie is a genius. He’s certainly a writer of some talent though. I’m also wary of accepting your ‘prizefighter’ analysis of his words about Farrel. He was simply asked which of the works by other writers who have won the Booker Prize he admired most, and he responded. Rushdie has always been generous in his praise and advocacy of writers whose work he rates highly.

  • lemme tell you a rushdie story. i used to work at clean well-lighted place bookstore in san francisco and rushdie’s moor’s last sigh came out, he dropped by to sign copies of his book. as per our store policy, one of staff offered him a book of his choice. he asked for a recent book of calvino. my colleague pointed out the book carries your blurb. sheepishly he said, now he can actually read it. so i hope you understand the complex world of praise. rushdie has been known to prasie mediocrities too. just look up his mirrorwork. anyway, the real point i tried to drill was that the western male writer (by fault of his own) is not equipped/educated enough to deal with non-white/muslim/southasian character. that either leads to them being absent, marginalized or caricatured. just look at two recent examples of the latter: updike’s terrorist or andre dubus the 3rd’s garden of last days. now admittedly these are 2nd rate novels compared to Farrell’s siege, yet majority of non-white readers of english have lost interest (perhaps to their own detriment) in white male’s narcism. this is precisely the sentiment that rushdie’s MC exploits and remains popular and a sort of a bible for at least south asian readers and writers alike regarding english.
    - moazzam

  • Sudha Shastri

    I have read _Midnight’s Children_ several times but only just begun reading _The Siege of Krishnapur_. I can see the narrator’s critique of the colonising British, but he also buys into the coloniser’s racist perspective. What else can be made of the description of the Indians (or to quote from the book, “natives”) rowing the ramshackle boat on the Hooghly river as “cutthroat Dravidians”? Why would they be Dravidian in Bengal? Why cutthroat? They disappear from the story almost as soon as they appear, so whose throat did they cut? These questions would be redundant if the description was part of a FID (Free Indirect Discourse) technique, but that is not the case. In the 1970s, this is a remarkable phrase indeed.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>