Recent Posts

  • If you can’t sell books, sell teddy bears September 3, 2010
    Or that seems to be Borders’ solution to its constant financial problems, at least for the time being until the next quarter with lower than expected sales.  Really, the problem with Borders is that it lost its identity about eight or so years ago when it decided to become a shadow of Barnes & Noble.   [...] […]
    Soo Jin Oh
  • Reflections on Rockwell September 3, 2010
    In recent years, fans of Norman Rockwell, with the assistance of some art historians, have attempted to lift him into the canon of high art. As a fan of midcentury American illustration, I don’t really care how he is assessed on that scale: like the recurring fantasy that underlies so much of our politics of [...] […]
    Levi Stahl
  • A Taste of Cherry in a Heat Wave September 3, 2010
    I’ve been thinking a lot about heat waves. The thick summer weather has felt like a wall of fire that must be bravely pushed through to order to exit from an air conditioned office building and make my way to the corner to board a bus crowded with sweaty citizens. So perhaps it’s no surprise that [...] […]
    Carrie Olivia Adams
  • The Ballad of David Markson September 3, 2010
    "What’s not so up for dispute is that Markson accomplished what, by all rights, should be a literary impossibility." (Colin Marshall for The Millions) […]
    Jeff Waxman
  • Gass-X September 3, 2010
    "Ich liebe dich. No sentence pronounced by a judge could be more threatening. It means that you are about to receive a gift you may not want." Via Dylan Suher, Greg Gerke's sort-of review of William H. Gass's Reading Rilke in BIG OTHER. […]
    Jeff Waxman

Shop at Amazon though these links and this site gets a kickback.

Group Reads

Last Samurai

Fall Read: The Last Samurai by Helen DeWitt

Starting Sept 19, read one of the '00s most-lauded postmodern novels. Info here. Buy the book here and support this site.

Tale of Genji

The Summer of Genji

Two great online lit magazines team up to read a mammoth court drama, the world's first novel.

Your Face Tomorrow

Your Face This Spring

A 3-month read of Javier Marias' mammoth book Your Face Tomorrow

  • In Homer’s Head: Ransom by David Malouf
    In Ransom, Malouf satisfyingly gives us a meeting between Priam and Achilles that builds from the interiority of Priam. The novel seems to want to teach the importance of doing something human to those who might never get around to picking up Homer or who, if they do, might wish they could get into the character's heads. […]
  • How Jeanette Winterson Makes Fiction
    Winterson has always told and retold the same fictions: of parents and children; of origins, and adoptions; of differences, of margins; of love; of passion; she has always manipulated rhythm and language as an excavation of sources. Much of her fiction mirrors what we know of Winterson's own story, but she agitates against the idea that her work has to […]
  • Inveterate and Unrepentant Book Collecting: A Guide to My Favorite Contact Sport
    It's difficult to pin down exactly why books as objects mean so much to me. I wasn't alive when William Goyen's excellent Come, The Restorer was published, but owning an original printing with the dust jacket—as it would have been purchased at the time of its release—makes the book more special to me than some beat-up paperback rei […]
  • The Master of the Not Quite: The Broken Estate: Essays on Literature and Belief by James Wood
    Wood can be harsh, yes, but he is seldom unfair. Wyatt Mason was wrong to accuse him of having suggested, by dint of a string of negative reviews, that no good contemporary literature exists. (He has written favorably of McEwan, Bolaño, Robinson, Ozick, Kirsch, Sebald, Roth, Saramago, Swift, Carey.) He never simply dismisses a writer (in the manor of, s […]

Writers vs. Commentators

Writers vs. Commentators

Right now I'm in the midst of Rex by Jose Manuel Prieto as I read my way though the finalists for the Best Translated Book Award. As it happens, this book has quite a bit to recommend, but right here I want to focus on a certain dichotomy of Prieto's that I find very intriguing.

The narrator of Rex simply idolizes Proust. He loves him so much that he won't even say Proust's name: he just calls him the Writer. And he thinks that everything knowable in the world can be found within In Search of Lost Time. It's hard to explain exactly what the narrator means by these things without having you read Rex, but suffice to say that per Rex's narrator, Proust is the consummate form of the artist as creator.

Now, in contrast to the Writer is the Commentator, who kind of resembles the omega to Proust's alpha. The narrator eventually drops enough hints that we understand that the Commentator is none other than Borges. Essentially, where the Writer holds the power of creation, the Commentator can only create by commenting on what has come before. While it's clear that Rex's narrator sees the Writer as clearly superior to the Commentator, he does admit that the latter has a little something to his credit (though not nearly as much as the Writer does). Again, it's hard to say just what is meant by calling Borges the Commentator, but my brief explanation gives the basic idea.

Though I have some issues with this schema, these are nonetheless wonderfully fascinating archetypes to try and fit writers into, not in the least because their exact boundaries remain unclear. As I was mulling this over through the weekend, I came to the conclusion that they roughly correspond to modernist/postmodernist (at least as understood by someone like Enrique Vila-Matas), as well as to Harold Bloom's concept of the strong and the weak poet (but this does get a little complicated, since Bloom would probably say that everyone, strong or weak, a commentator to a certain degree, with Shakespeare, and perhaps some of the ancients, being the Writer).

In light of what I'm about to say, I want to be clear that I'm not using Writer or Commentator in a pejorative way. They're simply descriptive terms that I find interesting, and possibly useful. And so, with that disclaimer in mind, I now ask you: which of our contemporary (or near-contemporary) authors fit into the category Writer, and which fit into the category Commentator?

Here are my own highly debatable guesses.

Writer
Proust
Philip Roth
Cormac McCarthy
Steve Erickson
Kazuo Ishiguro
William T. Vollmann
Norman Rush
Haruki Murakami
Richard Powers
In Between

Don DeLillo
W.G. Sebald
J.M. Coetzee
George Saunders

Commentator
Borges
Nicholson Baker
Enrique Vila-Matas
Aleksandr Hemon
David Foster Wallace
Salman Rushdie
Pass it on:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

6 comments to Writers vs. Commentators

  • Muy interesante. Tengo mis dudas. Veo claro al sitio que quieras llegar cuando dices que DeLillo está in between (sobre todo por la voz de White Noise y la de Underworld). No lo tengo tan claro con Sebald. Quizá su autoficción ensayística despiste, pero diría que está más cerca de Vila-Matas que de Roth (del Roth novelístico, claro, no del Roth de The Facts). La presencia de Saunders me desconcierta.
    Creo que otro in-betweener sería Fresán. La voz de Fresán es harto interesante porque se mueve entre la especulación de Vila-Matas y la descripción totalizadora de Proust. Sería otra conexión muy estimulante.

  • Lots to think about here! I wonder how (or whether) this could line up with Barthes’ distinction between “readerly” (lisible) and “writerly” (scriptible) texts—recently put to good use by Steven Moore, in The Novel: An Alternative History (at least the introductory chapter, which I picked up at MLA).

  • Matt,
    That’s another interesting way to think about the dichotomy. Though I must add that after reading (and liking very much) S/Z, I’m still not completely clear on what Barthes meant by “readerly” and “writerly”

  • S/Z itself has been a while for me—and Moore makes it clear that he’s adapting to for his own purposes. What’s interesting is that his history presents the “writerly” text as the over/underdog, the perversely neglected star of the history of the novel. Does the writer/commentator schema also lead to mistakes about priority? Actually, I think Rex is genuinely about that, at least in part.

  • It’s ironic Proust is the epitome of the non-commentator because – given the definition of commentator here – he is also clearly commentating on what went on before: think of the old title translation, remembrance of things past. Yet of course he is also creating or rediscovering the past as he writes; and only by writing can he do so.
    Unfortunately this kind of taxonomy will also be prejorative as people value creativity over commentary because they have a romantic notion of a separation and tend to laud those authors who write in denial of the impossible separation or are unable to contain it in the work itself – Dickens for example – and sniff at writers like Vila-Matas who include everything in their work. Literature is part of the world too, albeit a strange part.

  • I agree with S.M. above. That dichotomy collapses as soon we think it through. Proust comments obsessiely and relentlessly on Art, Literature and essentially provides an entire theory of the within his novel. This of course is one of his innovations. Meanwhile, Borges, the supposed commentator, is now regarded as a one of the great innovators, generating new forms for fiction.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>